This seems a tad steep to me, even in a year of lower quality films. I saw it yesterday and the cinematography is absolutely stunning, of that there is no doubt. I also enjoyed Pitt's performance. But the science behind it all, even with my relatively small knowledge of the subject matter...
I thought Crash was a big pile of steaming dog crap but lots of people seemed to love it.
I get why people wouldn't like Birdman, but I just loved Keaton's performance in it. It's a quirky film though, so I get why it's not for everyone.
I totally get what you're saying, but it's a film rather than a TV series. And ultimately the ignorant are usually enlightened by exposure to the thing they are ignorant about. 2 months of being with one person, non stop, is probably going to change your perception a bit, especially when you see...
Well it totally stereotypes Italian Americans but apart from that it's a very good movie. I'm not sure how engrossed a 12 year old Stat Child would be by it, mind.
Totally agree. Great chemistry between the leads and it really was funny.
Also, it shouldn't need to be said, but How to Train a Dragon 3 is a work of art if that type of film tickles your fancy.
Contrary to popular opinion on here I thoroughly enjoyed The Favourite. It has a witty script, great acting and it’s really playful in its storytelling.
I also saw Stan and Ollie today. This was a pleasant 6/7 out of 10 film with adorable performances but it wasn’t nearly as funny as I’d...