Sorry - not earring. Pendant, or whatever tat they were selling. They sold two at £850, then slashed the price to £350, and sold no more. Both went through (at the final £350 price)
I didn't understand the task last night, in general. Surely the win needed to be judged on PROFIT rather than SALES?
It made no sense. If one team had chosen an item costing £700, with an RRP of £1,000, and knocked out hundreds of them at a tenner apiece, they'd have 'won' the task, despite...
3 defeats from 3 tasks as PM sealed Tom's fate, but he was royally hard done by last night.
Stitched into taking the helm by the manipulative snide Jackie (yes, of course he could have said no), he did a reasonable job, and actually was the TOP contributor on the task itself. He made a decent...
You have to be kidding?
On the basis of last night he absolutely HAD to go, no question. The task was about profit. His contribution (securing a £130 'deal' for over £200 worth of goods) in itself was probably enough, but he sealed his exit by clearly demonstrating that he simply didn't...
For sure. It just stood out for me as odd, that she never tried to defend it, and just left it as inexplicable choice that made no sense.
(At least in the boardroom - she couldn't defend it to the BA bloke in the pitch, as she bottled even being on the pitch, which was unusual for a PM)
Both teams were woeful throughout, but the blanket criticism of the 'Highway to Hell' choice was a bit annoying.
The (weak) concept of their advert, was the business traveler, suffering a crap experience on another airline - thus the song choice to marry in with that. Then the tagline, 'NEXT...