Search results

Yes, and they'd be favourites, but it's still better than facing Brazil.

Pathetic. You've now changed your argument to how clear and obvious it was and whether VAR should intervene, but that's not what you were getting wrong. You were boo hooing me as if I was a Brazil sympathiser, despite the fact that I was supporting Belgium. And you said "I wouldnt have given it...

There was a Uruguayan player crying when there was still 5 minutes of the match left. What a tw@.

If the ball was out of play, it wouldn't be a penalty. It wasn't out of play, as is clear from the replays from the right angle. So the fact that he wasn't going to score is not relevant. And the fact it was a genuine attempt at a tackle doesn't stop it being a foul and a penalty. :facepalm: Oh...

Seriously? Not being able to score from somewhere is irrelevant when deciding if something is a penalty. Who are you boo hooing? :shrug:

Blimey, I'm going mad.

You sure? Indeed, but that doesn't suddenly make them the better side on the night, things just went their way. The own goal wasn't because they were great, they had a bit of luck. It actually wasn't dubious once you saw the right angle, it was clear. I agree and I'm glad they're out, but what's...

Yes they had to, but obviously Belgium would have stopped Brazil having so many chances if they could have. But they couldn't, Brazil were playing far better than Belgium, and after getting one back, should have had a penalty. I disagree about the better team winning.

Really? I'm glad Belgium won, I've gone right of the cheating Brazilians, but Brazil played better. Belgium were fortunate with the own goal, then they played well and scored and excellent second. Everything else was Brazil though, and Belgium were lucky to win. But I'm pleased they did.