Search results

heard a theory that Uber started as a massive money laundering operation that went out of control, guys leading it believed their own hype. the idea was innovative though flawed as no barriers to competitors, early "investors" sold on long ago, hopping off the hype train.

what has that got to do with Brighton taxis? perhaps in London there are more competition from other taxis services, private hire, public transport (i have rarely felt the need to get a cab over tube), so the standard is higher. outside London where local licensed cabbies are a monopoly, the...

cabbies?

people seem to be offended by how Uber operate somewhere else and overlook they are still subject to regulation here (and elsewhere usually). there is not race to the bottom either, simply a competitor cutting overhead costs and allowing causal employment in this area without being tied to...

nonsense. you dont have to use something to understand how something works and more importantly judge whether a service is conforming to standards, regulations, effect on other serivice providers so on. thats what the license should be based on, not personal like or dislike./