Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. S

    [Football] Jacob Rees-Mogg.

    Surely it would have been a greater conflict of interest had he not done any sabre rattling? Further sanctions will most likely depress the share price of the bank. The shares don’t seem to be owned by him personally but by a fund run by his company - I think this has been covered previously in...
  2. S

    [Football] Jacob Rees-Mogg.

    The article is almost 4 years old, do you know how it played out and the outcome for JRM? Without wishing to defend him, if those shareholdings were part of several hundred holdings in a billion £ fund, disclosure might not be as straightforward as the article suggests.
  3. S

    [Football] Jacob Rees-Mogg.

    Thanks for clarifying. I had thought their need for disguise was to do with their pre-meditated and uninvited attendance at an event that they intended to disrupt because they are unable or unwilling to enter into reasoned debate. Obviously I was mistaken and they simply stumbled into this event...
  4. S

    [Football] Jacob Rees-Mogg.

    Well said. I’ve yet to see any explanation as to why the “peaceful” protesters found it necessary to hide / disguise their appearance.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here