Oh I have no trouble sleeping at night, especially after picking apart your emotive ill informed posts. For Example, who told you projecting emotional arguments was a good response to rational thought?
I mean weve had the "you arrogant" response followed up by the you "emotionally disturbed"...
The thing is the difference between arrogance and confidence is experience, I have signalled I had some you have not therefore the claim you are projecting your arrogance is valid. Also if I am arguing with someone and i have only superficial knowledge of the subject but they signal they have...
Examples? Such as?
Examples? Such as?
Examples? Such as?(btw I posted a utube link didn't it show?)
Originally You jumped in claiming low growth was a myth, the onus would be on you to provide evidence, all you came up with was a letter signed by 100 plus economists. This is called the...
Gender Pay gap is a myth, its a fraction of 9% which has multiple factors and has no policy prescription. With Labour suffering inflation net GDP would be a better measure. I find your arguments, sloppy, incoherent and superficial. Im guessing your economics is limited to GCSE and your about 17...
The Oil price played the majority effect in the Inflation boom the, the problem was trying to limit it using Keynsian economics like price controlls, although you are correct about callahagn he agreed above inflation payrises in advance for the next government which exasperated the early 80s...
Irrelevant
GDP, GNP net GDP and net GNP are measures you do measure in isolation or to be more exact the change in those measures over time.
You need to quote sources for those claims, for starters the biggest increase in female employment came in the 80s with the growth in the service...
Not school but Schools and dont project emotions as tthat is sloppier than your original comment. Its not Blinkered its History, we had Labour government in the 70s going to the IM>F for money as they were broke, the winter of discontent in the late 70s, 25% inflation, because they let there...
Leading economists lol. Anything like the 364 Keynesian economists who wrote a letter to the Times claiming the economy was about to collapse after thatcher was elected.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3623669/How-364-economists-got-it-totally-wrong.html
Its not a myth its established fact, the debate, the serious ones you avoid are about the trade of between growth and equity. Not some kind of fantasy wankfest that leftish policies produce marvellous growth rates, they dont,