Search results

Well that's not vague at all :lolol: So in answer to my question, the goal is to "raise the issue of all forms of extremism to the government". So when will that goal be seen as achieved and the lads can spend their football-free weekend with 'the missus'?

So apart from the amazing success rate of stopping terrorist attacks (the very definition of counter terrorism) before we even find out about them, what EXACTLY do the FLA want the government and security services to do before they are satisfied they don't need to march each time their club...

Please. Many of these group of fans associated with the FLA have openly stated that one of the key aspects and symbolism of said march is that they are not fighting each other but standing together for once. That's where they've got the reputation from. There are self-confessed members of...

Ok. My next 'smart-arse' question (I'm REALLY trying to understand this) A protest Is done with an aim., change, if you will. Be it independence, a law change, a pay rise, better worker's rights. At what point will the FLA say "we don't need to protest anymore". What is the goal? Because...

Who are 'these people' who are walking around 'our' land? Just for clarification, like.

I've turned up for our right Please sir no, I don't want to fight Sure, you're Palace and I'm Brighton But that doesn't mean we should get a fight on I wanna hug you, and caress your thigh and touch your lips as I hear you sigh... ah sorry, got carried away there.

Jessica aged 4 and 3/4

Ah. Completely different. I was thrown by all the photos of him smiling and posing with people on the march. I was also thrown by his comment "I'm happy we were able to attend and report on what those marching with the FLA really believe" Clearly he is not pro FLA at all. thanks. ps...

He can't possibly be an extremist. He was at the FLA march..... Oh I'm confused now.

Apart from the amazing success rate of foiling terrorist plots before they happen and locking people up.

It won't make march 4. Extremism should be stopped by march 3. The terrorists hadn't realised we didn't like what they were doing.

Ooooh YOU BITCH

Genuine question. The Bristol element said something like "rather than fighting each other, we are all marching together" :lolol: What I'm asking is, does that mean they will all go back to fighting each other now the football is back on.

Never said you did. Read it again. Its well publicised. Read up about it. No. Thankfully. Of what? Extremism? Yeah its not my favourite thing Nope. Next question. Up to them what they call it. I can still hold the opinion it is exclusive, comical and holds connotations. Not broken the law...

:lolol: ok

Another post which seems to suggest that thinking the march is rubbish means you are happy with terrorism. Odd The two are completely seperate things. I also love the argument of "well at least we are doing something about it". The government are aware we dont like getting blown up. I dont...

So is it the ones who know who they are that are burying their heads in the sand or those who know who are the people who know who they are who are burying their heads ....or are both the people who both know each other know that each other know they know who those people are?

Man can't read posts on a forum and continues to make incorrect statements in summary, worrying.

Have all the members of the FLA decided to permanently stop extreme behaviour towards one another or was it just for this one weekend where they didn't have any football to go to? A bit like the WWI xmas day football match.....just much less heroic.....and much less hair......and quite a bit...

Weird isn't it. I'm quite comfortable thinking anyone who is a "terrorist" is a prick.......and anyone who would actually refers to themselves as a "Football Lad" (:lolol:) is also not quite my cup of tea.