Think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, size of competitor isn't the defining factor for me, but how deadly the situation could be. For me, in comparative terms, the GM is in a more dangerous situation against a more formidable opponent (in pound for pound terms).
And then the added...
A few lions that clearly aren't hungry, or particularly bothered, and the best it does is make them walk away.
Or a hungry centipede, actively looking to kill the mouse, with poisonous fangs, yet the mouse not only avoids being killed, but then bites it's head off and eats it.
GM is definitely...
But you quoted size of its opponents as a reason for that. I'm arguing (and I would've thought that HB voters would understand this) that it's not just the size of its opponents that make an animal hard; it's how dangerous those opponents are and therefore how mental it is to even enter that...
How about the other rodents it kills that are much bigger? Oh, and the centipedes and snakes. The poisonous ones.
And just because scorpions and tarantulas are smaller, it doesn't make the mouse less hard for taking it on, when those it attacks are vicious, aggressive and deadly in themselves -...
There are two double account votes for the HB already.
Forget BHA, the only football comparison you can make here is between HB and The Complete And Utter Shyster.
If anything, those of you voting HB are ensuring that BHA's promotion deciding game will he reffed by The Complete And Utter...