Search results

These two posts seem to me to be good descriptions of the common sense approach. Scientific theory tends to rely on assumptions so we proceed on a balance of probability. We can argue about the science but what is the point when exercising restraint on pollutants brings so many tangible benefits...

Genuine question : what media bias against it ? I believe that there is a high likelihood of man made global warming and whenever I see/hear a discussion in the media that seems the general consensus...

I'm on your side of the climate change debate but I disagree with your view on scientists. There are many times in history when scientific consensus has been challenged and turned around. Carrying out a poll of scientists' current views proves nothing. If it did then that would be the end of...

I was referring to the question in your OP. It frames the debate and implies anyone who disagrees with you is a conspiracy theorist.

But your question was framed in terms of does one believe or disbelieve in the fact. Anyone (not me btw) who thinks global warming to be cyclical will be caught up in the 'disbelieve the fact' camp and will have their intelligence insulted. It's just another issue used by people to make...

As far as I'm aware global warming is a scientific fact. The debate is over what to do about it or whether to do nothing about it as some believe it is cyclical. Is this another example of a debate being incorrectly framed to create distrust ? As a by the by I am of the view that we should do...