Search results

When was this scientific consensus that you speak of?

Why do you believe Judith Curry but ignore the other climate scientists?

The UK is unwarlike? We love a war.

I agree ti a certain extent but when the dissenters refer to "globull warming" and refuse to cite any sources it's hard to take them seriously.

In my opinion someone who disagrees with 97% of scientists based on what they've read on the internet probably is on the conspiracy theorist spectrum.

There were 3 options in the poll. Does it need a 4th? If so, what do you suggest?

Nasa are the green lobby? Where are you getting your information from. Care to post some links? Re. 97% - http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002/pdf

I don't think it's being incorrectly framed. People are free to say what they want and hopefully back it up with some evidence.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals (http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002) show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past...

Thread started in response to a post on another thread. Despite overwhelming scientific consensus, it seems some people still harbour doubts about global warming/climate change. So what do you think? The scientists are right or are they driven by a shady leftist agenda :)