Search results

The first premise in your post dictates that they have.

This may be the case, but it is speculative. My point was that B&HA have done well in: -- securing Dunk on a long-term contract -- not inserting a transfer fee trigger clause -- holding out on a policy, revealed repeatedly by Bozza, that we'll only sell Dunk to the PL for £5m+ All of which...

Both you and cardboard seem to be proving my point: we haven't inserted a 'low' release clause in Dunk's contract.

Looks like Burnley are going to sell Trippier to Spurs for £3.5m, which puts a £5m bid for Dunk into perspective. Trust we manage to also negotiate a sell-on clause. Barber IN :jester:

I suspect you're right, but if: -- a PL club comes in with a decent price, and he wants to go, he's gone -- a Championship club buys him, then I might have to join the gloomy gang

This is not your most confident statement.

I agree that he has these faults, but they can be coached out of him. He also has a number of attributes: reads the game well; excellent tackler; excellent header of the ball at both ends of the pitch; scores goals; impressive distribution for a CB.

It's all the more likely that they'll have the opposite effect than the CommonsFlamer suggests. Firstly, Championship football players have a lot more money, so are less concerned at north/south property price discrepancies. And secondly, the value of southern houses have increased far more than...

That Bloom, he's got no ambition, rules him out the Labour Party leadership contest too :moo::dunce:

Corrected for you