Is this actually true? Educational reasons can mean that the certification can be by-passed. Does this mean that an 18-rated film showing explicit sex scenes could be shown with impunity, if a member of staff decided that that this would aid sexual awareness in 13 year olds?
No, this should not have been done. In other areas, the school would talk about responsibility and the dangers of being exploited when you are underage etc etc. I think it may just have been an oversight or an expectation that it would be OK, as kids are so much more worldly now, not that that...