Search results

I'm not disagreeing with that. But that fact remains that even with the team aspect, cycling is still primarliy a test of flat-out endurance. Football is not. Sure there are advantges to a team that can run and run and run for 90 minutes...but put Stoke City up against Barcelona and 99 times out...

I'm not saying there'd be no advantage for a footballer to be drugged up to the eyeballs to enhance and aid his stamina. But there is a starker advantage to a cyclist. 1. Its an individual sport. 2. There is little skill involved in cycling. Cycling is PRIMARILY about strength and endurance...

Football is largely decided by skill. Cycling is decided by endurance and power. Drugs can never enhance skill or talent.