Search results

But they didn't. So that's your argument torpedoed in the first sentence. Strange logic to begin with anyhow.

Just concerned you're coming across as a bit of a dinosaur. Guy has been found guilty of a crime that's finally being taken seriously and rightly so. More serious hate crimes usually start with milder ones so best nip in the bud. Which is why the law hasn't passed a harsher sentence. On a...

I'll judged is the only bit you're making sense about. You're blithering on like an eejet, re: the rest. Hush now, justice served. A minor crime but a crime nonetheless. Justice done. Move on.

Not read the report - only the headline. Amend that to whoever was appointed by the law to make a ruling.

But you don't appear to with comments like 'real homophobia' and you betray a degree of prejudice with others like 'more about politics'. I'd leave this argument to the grown ups if I were you such as the judge and jury that's apparently found him guilty this afternoon.

What aren't you understanding - he was bending over in sight of thousands and TV cameras insinuating some if not many members of the crowd 'take it up the arse' so's to speak. Of all the grounds he visits, why do this at the Amex? Coincidence? Hmmm, don't think so. Ow, then there's the small...