Search results

Oh dear - you are hopelessly in love with yourself. You have nothing to say, yet you still persist. If only you actually said something worthwhile, rather than just posted meaningless waffle, there might be something worth debating. But you've had 60-odd goes at it, and still failed.

Did you understand the very simple point I made? Or are you that THICK?

You don't need to get past those first six words to appreciate your point of view is meaningless. Of course, you may live your life in isolation; me, I talk to supporters of many other clubs - my weekend sideline dictates than I need to. And guess what...? See if you can work out the rest.

And your purpose to all this is...?

Only because you uninvited lot can't keep your stories straight all the while you keep infesting it. Just remember, you're tolerated, not welcomed on here. Know your place.

Who cares? This thread is about the hypocrisy of your chairman. You're also lying when you say I think WZ is shite. So well done on both counts. No matter how many of you lot come on here with a tag-team performances of trying to shift the argument away from his hypocrisy, none of you will...

So what are you concerning yourself with a Manchester United bench-warmer for then?

He doesn't dive because he doesn't need to? :facepalm: Outstanding. Meanwhile, back on this planet, Zaha is well-noted for his diving. Your denial only makes you sound like an amoral hypocrite.

Is that what you're most proud of? That you produced a player of dubious, self-denying morality who went to Manchester United? And it's 'your', not 'you're'.

I suspect you tragically and honestly believe that too. It's up (sorry, down) there with Richard Keys' "... he deserved to go down...", Andy's Gray's "... his momentum took him over..." and even Jason Roberts' "... well, there was contact..."

If you 'won' (actually you're awarded a penalty) a penalty, it follows the referee didn't think there was simulation. It doesn't follow that there wasn't, though. So using the 'one card for simulation' isn't much of a defence.

:facepalm: When you miss the point, you do it in style.

You have to remember that, while the mods say you're welcome (against sage advice) - you weren't invited on here.

No, this is a fact. Tony Bloom only makes statements on Brighton & Hove Albion. Occasionally. And never on wider football issues. So, to judge him against Parish's vanity statements doesn't really wash.

Tony Bloom rarely makes public statements on any issue. So, if you want to judge other chairmen by your own chairman's low-class, simpering, blow-wave standards, feel free. You will come up short.

Look at the thread title, and consider that statement again. Arhur, El Presidente and others have made the case quite succinctly, and you're side-stepping it claiming a different agenda. What play-offs? Oh, those play-offs. No, got over them in a couple of days. We don't all sit and grizzle...

He may well be right, but it is a bit like Eric Pickles (or me, for that matter) moaning that, as a nation, we are an embarrassment as we are too overweight.