Search results

Now 33/1. It would be an odd appointment but there is clearly something in it. Where the connection comes from I have no idea, but I've heard his name mentioned from two different sources, who are usually fairly reliable.

I'm thinking of doing it as well, I've now heard his name from another source, there does seem to be something in it. I'd be surprised if we took him on as manager though, I would have thought he'd be a number 2, but manager is what I've heard.