What is worse to bite a players arm or make a lunging over the top tackle that could finish his career, as per the recent incident with a Wigan player. As a player I wouldnt want either particularly but given a choice I know where my vote would go.
I think that he is right about double standards by the FA. There are clear pictures in all of the press showing the ref looking at the bite marks on Ivanovic arm so he saw it and decided to take no action, which is what the FA quote if they dont or cant charge a player to take retrospective...