Search results

I see your point, you'll no doubt have noticed that I frequently post unsubstantiated stuff about the Albion. :wink: Seriously though, happy to help.

attila met with club representatives some time back, and it was mentioned then - See his notes on this board from that meeting. Happy now, or do you wish keep on flogging this poor dead donkey? Just to reiterate, I am not against installing rail seating.

*sigh* So what do you propose to do about the concourse for the North Stand then? That is the limiting factor, not the number of seats. If you can come up with something easy and cheap then I'm all ears - bear in mind that it'd need to be both physically bigger and require more toilets at the...

Quite, there is no reason I can see why rail seats shouldn't be fitted in either the North or South Stands should circumstances change. It just won't affect the capacity in terms of the number of people actually allowed into those areas as symyjym seems to think.

I did have a look at your link, but discounted the information therein due to the limiting factor of the size of the Amex concourses - the capacity of the North Stand cannot be increased by just installing rail seats, and it is debatable as to whether the same is true for the South.

The only point I have made is that the North Stand capacity has been met already, and this has been previously stated by the club in relation to the impact of installing rail seating there. Quite frankly I don't believe fitting rail seating in the South Stand is going to increase the capacity...

No it wouldn't, because the North Stand concourse is only capable of accommodating the amount of people it already has seats for in the stand.

That 90% only voted to say they'd support safe standing at the Amex; that isn't the same as demanding it be installed irrespective of the current law, and is without any understanding of the practicalities of doing so should there be a change in the law in the future.