Search results

And, that is exactly how it should be. No room for sentiment in sport.

I think we actually paid £2.5m plus add-ons? The other thing is we obviously paid too much anyway, and could do with some money back and saving his wages - providing they go towards the quality of striker that will get us promoted.

For me, it is the fact that he is so wasteful. Certainly last season, he had many good chances which he failed to even test the other team's keeper with. Those chances were hard to come by with our style of play, and demanded more care. We are not a Posh, who's only tactic is to get the ball to...

We already have that person. His name is Ashley Barnes. He shoots when CMS is standing in the way. CMS gets a touch, and is credited with a goal. Simples!

Well, the ladies and "gays" amongst us may not be? lol I would be very happy to get him off our payroll and some of our investment back. I have great faith in Gus improving our strike force with the money.

It's no good on there Bozza - please keep us informed on here as well.

Really? Christ, you have got great inside information. I would have thought we would be discussing a fee and seeing what we could do about a replacement before doing any deal. But hey ho, if that is what you know.

The Argus says that selling CMS will only happen if other deals fall into place.

Get in there! Back of the net! Whoops, not really appropriate is it? Not when talking about CMS.

Frankly, yes I can. But that it of no relevance. The point is they are high, and if Guy can use them for someone else who is more effective, he may wish to do so.

It is called cutting your losses. If we are to believe what we have been told, he is on very high wages. Maybe Gus has a better use for them IF he can (or even wants to) offload him? The selling price would not be the only consideration.

It is called cutting your losses. If we are to believe what we have been told, he is on very high wages. Maybe Gus has a better use for them IF he can (or even wants to) offload him? The selling price would not be the only consideration.

In that case he may be actually able to score a goal by himself at some point, instead of just getting in the way of Barnes' shots? We will see if he stays.

What anti-CMS brigade? Do you mean those who want to see a striker who can control a ball and score goals? I am one of those, and I can confirm that I am a big fan of young Ashley Barnes. I also admire Liam Bridcutt, Will Buckley, and a number of the other players. So, what is your point?

He better watch out before he gets a darn good thrashing! lol

So, because he is on low wages, we should keep him? Is that what you are suggesting? So the fact he could not hit a cow's arse with a banjo does not matter - because he accepts lower wages than those who can actually do the job properly? I do hope the Club are not fixated with that type of...

I see what he did there. Very clever.

I hope you mean seven?

If we can get anywhere near what we paid for him, and release his, no doubt high, wage costs, it will be good business. Oh, and please don't start insulting me as well because I don't agree with you.

I agree.