Search results

You said you'd bite there arm off for £3m. You didn't say 'only if we have another striker lined up' which is kinda crucial.

Thank god you're not in charge. We've made a profit of >= £700k for Noone, and we've replaced him. You'd be happy with a profit of £500k for CMS, with no replacement, so we can spend the next few months without a first choice striker. Genius.

Where have they suddenly got £3m from? Didn't see that coming.

The club would only take it if they had a replacement, and replacement strikers are becoming more and more expensive.

on a random website EDIT - swine

Not really, we just haven't been playing to his strengths, he hasn't got worse. The fact that Rhodes just went for daft money doesn't hurt the value of other strikers either. If we were trying to get rid his value would fall, if other teams were after him, it would go up.

Is that a euphemism?

That's just what CMS is like though, ignore it all until it's a done deal. He doesn't like to let himself get involved in this stuff.

As did I some time before that. Not really trying to take credit, it's just bloody obvious.

Spectacular

Woooosh

Too sensible for this lot.

Everyone seems blind to the obvious.

Even if they meet our valuation, we'd be mad to let him go without a replacement signed. We already need another striker even if he stays. What happens if teams meet our valuation for all our players, do we sell them all and field our reserves?

Gus has commented on how difficult it is to get a striker, and how their value is crazy, so I just can't see him letting our main striker go unless we already have a replacement (striker) signed.

:lolol: