Firstly I'm assuming that I'm no longer on ignore, can't understand why you have no idea what I'm saying, it's not rocket science (pun definately intended)
Never seen that site before, NWO sites don't really interest me. I'm only interested in the fakery spoon fed to us from the media.
You realise the moon landings have reached their 'best before' date, when a 15 year old asks 'When were the last moon landings'
'1972'
And their answer is. 'What ! and man hasn't got the technology to get there now after 40 years, by having to keep putting the date of the next landings back...
The reality is, the nose cone of a 767 is depicted passing through a building unscathed, & it's now become your reality as you desperately try to find a reason to fit, when the most obvious reason is staring right at you, but you can't handle what the consequences of it are.
1)
1) And your the pratt who thinks the engine can fly over a hundred meters through the air from a height of 400 plus meters, then land under some scaffolding with out causing any damage to the side walk.
2) Yeah some scientific equation about entering the building between the floor and the...
The footage of the 2nd hit shown live on TV, depicted the nose cone of the plane entering WTC2, and coming out the other side in exactly the same condition as before it entered the building.
Go to the 3 minute 30 second mark. (just for a few minutes, you don't need to watch the whole video)
When I saw that it just looked to me like a load of anonymous posters on an internet forum. sorry if I couldn't be bothered to read it.
That is such a dumb statement, what the f*** does it mean, I think your referring to the people planting the handfull of plane parts I've already explained...
Still waiting for someone to explain how the 767 can fly through the building, with the nose cone popping out the other side still intact.
Plus a few verifiable names to eye witnesses would be usefull.
f*** it is you who is the cock, I have said there were no verifiable eye witnesses not working in the media, who saw an AEROPLANE.
Why the f*** do I have to prove that the wreckage was planted, when the wreckage itself is such that it could be easily planted, there is only about 4 isolated...
What proof, the only proof is what we were shown live on our TV screens on the actual day.
Which was a plane entering a building with it's nose cone popping out the otherside unscathed, once that cock up was realised everything else was damage control mode.
As for the eye witnesses, a couple...
So.CalGull
Why would they if they've been well rewarded or know of the dire consequences.
Did you mean to say that it would have been mainly eye witnesses that made up your figure of the 100,000 people, that you think would have been needed to pull off 9/11 ?
I thought you were refering to...
That is the only wreckage of fuselage there is from the 9/11 767s, Just another prop like the engine under the scaffolding.
Plenty of time to get it there for the photo opportunity. Or may be just a bit of photo shopping given the back ground. Who knows ?
.
As for your link.
Here's the...
This question is asked on a lot of forums discussing 9/11. Many truthers just point to the "Manhattan Project" as to an example of scores of thousands keeping quiet about a secret operation.
The whole 9/11 IMHO would have been highly compartmentalised on a need to know basis, probably only a...
A theory & thats all it is. (but at least it shows how easily some things can be done)
The engine could have been sitting on the first tier of the scaffolding covered in taupaulin or what ever, then simply lowered down.
Which raises an interesting point do the other pieces of wreckage also end...
Thats an interesting point, if the whole thing was faked why do such a bad job.
When it comes to the positioning of the Boeing parts, the places where you would most expect to find them such as at the foot of the towers, may have been to visible to passers by prior to show time.
Flying through the building penetrating both sides, thus twice negotiating its way through steel outer columns spaced at less than one meter apart, and sweeping aside from it's path what ever was inside the building internally.
Then continually travelling a distance of more than a Hundred of...