Search results

the answer is because theres f*** all there worth it. they push it back 10 years until there is political interest to waste money on the project or it becomes so cheap its within existing budgets. Anyone older than a 15 yo would ask the simpler, why go to the moon? thats not fair on 15yos of...

i know, thats what i thought too. though if you look up "Arab people" on wiki, they define them as North Africa and West Asia. West Asia in turn is shown as an area which includes Iran. i note now that further down the same page they show Iran as being part of South Asi in UN definitions. The...

the bus exploded by virtue of a bomber getting on the bus. that bomber had traveled down from Luton on a train with three others. in your version, he got out of bed late and presumably decided to go anyway by himself and once in London got on a bus "to see if the others were waiting for him"...

thats a new one. all four went in to London together. you must be confusing your conspiracies. dont blame you, there are so many intertwined with each other.

walking past, seeing a hundred people, dozens of emergncey vehicles and being told i had to walk the long way round. oh and it was in the metro the next day. probably a couple of times a year they do this. and where is your evidence for the training in the rush hour (which would have...

engineering works? they could do both, and there's 52 sundays every year too. i've been past Bank when they have been training and there was some recently, nice little photoshot to reasure us they are improving after the failings of 7/7. Sunday is do anything that requires fewer people around...

no they weren't. there was a office based role play scenario being carried out, no live emergency services involved. you think for a minute they would plan a training session for a Thursday morning in the rush hour? they do such things on Sundays, when the City is empty. oh wait, you would...

thou doth protest too much. you're the one bringing that up.

Do you have any concept of the context and meaning of that, and how irrelevent it is to the subjects of this thread? of course not, otherwise you wouldnt have done so.

i dont see how you manage to deduce from the poor video available that the nose cone is "unscathed". is there a high def close up showing how perfectly undamaged it is on the exit? no. you are merely relaying other people saying its "unscathed" when in reality all you can see, fake or real...

you keep saying that like its a fact. reality is you see a vague plane nosecone like shape, enveloped in an explosion. and what about the source of that explosion, is that fake too? or is this our frightfully clever cover explosion before the real explosions (unseen and unheard) that destroy...

firstly, you need to grasp that concept that at speed a airplane will puncture the relativly thin skin of concreate and steel on the outside of such a building. vans/jcbs have penetrated similar steel reinforced concreate at 30mph to commit ram-raids, it seems that a plane at 10-20x faster...

can i have a straight answer, how do you make the leap from all the apparent evidence against the "offical" version that the government was involved? where is the evidence of government being involved? and re the youtube clip with the wood and cinder blocks, are you seriously telling me people...

clearly i miss something in the news or dont understand. please come on and explain yourself not leave it for the rest of us to be misled. personally I can think of about four different and seperate issues covered there. so just what are China, Russia and Argentina, the middle east all...

you'll have to help me out, as i cant think of any contempory situation where a dictator has taken charge of a major nation, nor where one nation is attempting to re-unite an ethnic group or old borders, or think of a recent peace pact that is likly to be broken sometime in the next few years...

theres a couple of event in 1930s German leading to Hitlers power, which ever one you mean wasnt blamed on the Russians, nor as a pretext to war. Communist and other left wingers where blamed not outside agents. The war, years later, was justified by a completely different premise: that the...

the point is that the towers collapsed slower than "freefall" speed, claimed as indication of controlled demolition. if you remove the speed of collapse, you remove the initial point from which that argument begins. I dont know the exact times, im not going to rake of these old coals again...

Do people really still believe explosives were used to bring down three skyscrappers, despite no material evidence to show the demolition occured? (btw literally two puffs from blown out windows and a dozen loud no-descript explosions do not count as evidence, find footage of actual CT and see...

why bring them down at all? simple bombing tied to target group would have sufficed as an excuse to invade Afganistan, i'd have thought. question raised is, how do you rig an explosion to go off in a buliding and then plan to carry out a controlled demolition shortly afterwards? the first...

there wasnt faked footage. free your mind to this possibility. ask yourself, why fake footage of two plane crashed to coverup explosions when the explosions would have sufficed and done the job. people would have noticed if there hadnt been any plane "i was watching the burning tower and i...