Search results

My post, #390 on this thread, addressed the issue that fools that don't know what they are doing shouldn't tamper with videos. An EXPERT has verified. You also seem to have ignored all the personal video footage I posted of eye witnesses to the second plane striking the building. Never mind, if...

So far Colinz has produced zero evidence or proof and no sensible argument that they were faked. Probably because he has none. Nevertheless he is convinced they were, no doubt.

(I am sorry if I offend you Colinz.) He's decided what happened based on some idiot's video on Youtube. His mind is completely closed to any other version of the events including the TRUTH. Any proof that is posted, any argument that is raised, if it doesn't agree with his viewpoint then he...

That bloody "law enforcement officer" stopped me taking it away as a souvenir. Bastard!

No problem. I'll leave you to enjoy each other.

Then act like you've figured it out and shut up.

I was rather hoping that everyone was going to ignore this guy now. He's been disproved so many times but wont accept it and just moves onto his next drivel. You know if you keep responding he'll probably go on forever.

The second video clip doesn't seem to link properly. If you go to that site and search the timeline for Apr 5, 2006 you will see closeup footage of the 1st tower collapse which I believe ruins all ideas of controlled explosion. At the end there is a link to another video showing the 767 coming...

9 11 Video Footage Timeline This one you can see a closeup of the time the first tower collapsed. And no explosion causing it.

9 11 Video Footage Timeline Private individual videoing towers. If you keep pausing and playing around 20secs you can clearly see the 767 enter the building.

So, the first tower has been hit, by whatever and 10s maybe 100s of thousands of NYers would have been looking at the towers when the missile hit the second tower. Yes? So there are huge numbers of witnesses to testify that the TV footage was doctored to look like planes. Yes? Are we in agreement?

We don't need to provide evidence it is the widely accepted view. You need to prove otherwise.

You know the reason I asked you this so your post is just childish.

Thanks for the unnecessary aggression in your post. The point is you have come on here pertaining to be an independent supporter of another poster when in fact you are not. You not only know him you live in the same house as him.

OK as Rosa seems to find the question a bit difficult to answer. Falmer, do you live in the same house as Rosa?

Rosa Do you live in the same house as Falmer?

Are you seriously saying that you have read this thread and you came to that conclusion? I got frustrated with them because they continually avoid answering questions which put them on the spot and stick their heads in the sand when shown that their viewpoint is flawed. And I am in denial...

Another video. And this one is 8 minutes long. Do you know I just can't be bothered anymore. I have to assume that Falmer is a troll like Colinz.

I think I've already done that.

Probably because that was what he was contracted to do. Guess what, he failed. And I'm dumb, please give examples of why you would think that. I can give numerous examples questioning your intelligence.