Search results

No need for insults. 1) Yes. And Newton does too, but you're not so clued up on that so I'd leave it there if I were you. 2) 'Some scientific equation'?? You are clueless. You've had it explained to you (plus the fact that you don't have ANY evidence to say the nosecone was 'undamaged'), yet...

Its not a dumb statement at all. You made an assertion, but have no evidence to back it up and are claiming it as fact. So where's your evidence that it is fact? We all understand what it means, it seems to be just you who is struggling with it. As for proving what happens to the plane such...

I wonder if the cryptic comment with the smiley that colinz has posted stating that it landed underneath scaffolding is relevant? Are you saying how could it land UNDER the scaffolding? Or maybe you should have said that it 'came to rest' under the scaffolding, because - as you'll now know...

There have been a few programmes and quite a number of websites debunking every single claim made by conspiracy theorists about the moon landing too. Its quite interesting stuff (for me anyway, I'm into astronomy, and remember watching Neil Armstrong climb out of the module live on telly in the...

A good point, well made.

If you go back and read the original post I made on this, PARTS of the plane could, yes. If you think a plane hitting a building like that remains in one piece then again, you need to revisit your old science books.

I notice we've moved towards the, "there were no victims, all those bereaved families mourning loved ones are either in on it, or have been duped, or have been fabricated, or whatever." For me, this is the bit that moves away from a scientific debate (although that's been a one sided hammering...

Hi tezz, no it was in reply to readingstockport, who he jovially refers to as 'biggles' because this trivialises the fact that readingstockport actually undertands aerodynamics whereas colinz doesn't. On the subject of eyewitnesses seeing planes hit the towers, colinz himself has already posted...

The last bastions of somene who has no ability to justifytheir side of an argument. 1. Ignore questions that will give the game away when answered. 2. Change the subject and divert people away from flaws in your argument by asking a different question in response to a question being asked of...

Still dodging questions. Why don't you 'put up or shut up' as you so eloquently asked someone else on here?

That's clearly been CGI'd by Fox News. I don't know anything about what you ate last night but I do know one thing, it wasn't crackers. FACT.

So you DO presume something about what people saw? Why do you keep contradicting yourself? There you go again. Glad to hear you don't put a lot of value on hearsay, yet everything you believe on this subject has been based on fruitloop YouTube videos off the internet and a woefully inadequate...

We can only speculate. But yes, yes they are.

As has been debated, no one on here except one person can see any relation between the North Koreans (or "N.Korea" a few might abbreviate it to) and what went on on 9/11. But still that one person continues to drivel on about it. Except, no, hang on, they're two separate people, just using the...

Its obvious who you are. 1. You logged in at the same time falmer logged out 2. You both cannot spell the same words (their, there, they're) 3. You both ignore questions put to you, and simply sidestep and ignore selectively 4. You respond to the insults in exactly the same way 5. You both have...

falmer, not only did you admit to displaying symptoms of paranoia earlier in the thread, but you're now displaying symptoms of schizophrenia, and not only that, your other persona appears to be a girl!! You have SERIOUS issues mate.

I imagine if you were in a building a plane crashed into it and you didn't immediately know it was a plane, it would probably sound a bit like an explosion, high velocity impact, burning jet fuel, etc. Hence I would probably expect a large number of witnesses who weren't fully clued up would...

You have the same spelling issues as falmer I see. How do you know the vertical columns melted? My understanding is that steel doesn't need to melt in order to be weakened to the point where it can no longer perform the support capabilities it was originally designed for.

Maradona was lying. As for the physics thing, I don't think anyone on here is arguing that TV can outsmart physics. We're arguing that falmer and colinz grasp of physics is woefully inadequate. Pray tell, what is your level of understanding of physics (and I mean qualifications)?

You see, you need to ask an unloaded question, not a loaded one. The usage of the words 'how can you honestly..' at the beginning are completely unnecessary in asking the actual question itself, but instead imply that any answer not to your liking means the person answering is stupid. How was...