Search results

Fair enough except you will clearly rate Smith more harshly than you do Kuipers. I have never understood the obsession with Kuipers. He was a very good keeper at this level and still is a decent one but why people feel the need to be obsessed over him and blind themselves to the ability of all...

I disagree. Slade clearly wanted a new keeper and may well have rated Kuipers and Sullivan at a similar level but as Kuipers still had a year left signed him. I only react to the constant attacks on any keeper who is not Kuipers. I rate Kuipers but he is not the keeper he was. One question for...

I wish both Kuipers and Sullivan had been out of contract in the summer then maybe we would have kept Sullivan instead. I have nothing against Michel but no keeper (even if they are clearly better) will get a fair chance with some so called fans until he goes. If we signed Cech you would go on...

Sorry how is that different to what I said? I suggested it was in the best interests of the club for us to have two keepers on form to give the team options. Obviously you would then pick the best man whether it is Kuipers or Smith.

Or why not hope both keepers have a good game to give Slade a selection problem for the Walsall game and the team we support the best chance of succeeding? Just a thought.