[Football] The Football Governance Bill
- Thread starter Zeberdi
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
chip
Active member
Is it going to change the value of what they say? It's not like they a presenting information to people who have the highest standards. Confromity is best avoided in my view, I don't trust people in suits, certainly not more than those in t-shirts.
Mackenzie
Old Brightonian
Kieran Maguire spoke really well, oh to have that confidence.
- Apr 5, 2014
- 23,979
I thought they both complemented each other well. And both were visibly annoyed with ignorant questions from people who really don't know much.
I can imagine they will both be having a good bitch about it all on the way out.
Perfidious Albion
Well-known member
I have watched TB & Steve Parish . They gave a good account of themselves and had all the info at their fingertips.
Thanks for the link
Thanks for the link
portlock seagull
Why? Why us?
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,377
What are they exactly supposed to be doing / is it trying to achieve? If it’s an end to corruption in football and/or make it more competitive / look after the non rich 86 other clubs then…aren’t they pissing into the wind somewhat?
Superphil
Dismember
Premier League clubs don’t want a regulator so will do whatever they can the derail it.
I thought the same. Bloom’s argument about not wanting to be like Germany, France and Spain where one or two clubs dominate wasn’t convincing on the day Man City pretty much won their 5th title in 6 seasons either.
Last edited:
Slum_Wolf
Well-known member
- May 3, 2021
- 602
To be fair Bloom must have only just arrived back from Belgium so was on high after seeing his team win the Belgian Cup for the first time since 1914 and grab a draw at Club Brugge in the league on Monday evening...Parish was just glad to have something else to read beyond architectural plans for imaginary main stand developments.
The benefits of the regulator are more in sorrow than joy.
There are predators out there (and TB nor SP fall into that category and both spoke well) that see clubs as real estate opportunities (we have our own experience from the Goldstone) and there are others who utilise clubs for nefarious ends that I unfortunately can’t go into in detail.
The arguments against the regulator are
1: Cost. It will cost the PL, which spent £409m in agent Fees last year, £8m a year as a contribution to IR. That’s about £400k per club. Some of the work undertaken by IR can potentially replace what is dine by the PL, whose average cost per staff member is £141k
2: ‘Unintended consequences’ is a smokescreen for not wanting a revised distribution model with the EFL. The PL has ignored the unintended consequences of anchoring, FFP, selling more matches to broadcasters, bringing in new related party transactions rules part way through the season, EPPP and so on.
3; It might deter investors. Correct, it might deter investors such as Bill Archer, Steve Dale, Laurence Bassini, Lee Power, Ken Anderson and David Hilton. Those names may not mean much to some of you but ask fans of the clubs they were associated with.
4: UEFA/FIFA concerns about government interference in football. Yet we have banning orders, Alcohol bans, reselling of tickets, kettling by police and other restrictions as a result of legislation that applies to football and not other sports.
5; The Premier League is great as it is. This is the Premier League that is so great some of its members were behind SuperLeague, Project Big Picture, 39th Game, selling property to themselves to avoid PSR breaches, 115 charges and so on.
I genuinely feel sorry for Richard Masters, he looked a mess at Parlisment on Tuesday, it’s not worth the £1.9m a year if the job is going to have such an impact on his wellbeing.
There are predators out there (and TB nor SP fall into that category and both spoke well) that see clubs as real estate opportunities (we have our own experience from the Goldstone) and there are others who utilise clubs for nefarious ends that I unfortunately can’t go into in detail.
The arguments against the regulator are
1: Cost. It will cost the PL, which spent £409m in agent Fees last year, £8m a year as a contribution to IR. That’s about £400k per club. Some of the work undertaken by IR can potentially replace what is dine by the PL, whose average cost per staff member is £141k
2: ‘Unintended consequences’ is a smokescreen for not wanting a revised distribution model with the EFL. The PL has ignored the unintended consequences of anchoring, FFP, selling more matches to broadcasters, bringing in new related party transactions rules part way through the season, EPPP and so on.
3; It might deter investors. Correct, it might deter investors such as Bill Archer, Steve Dale, Laurence Bassini, Lee Power, Ken Anderson and David Hilton. Those names may not mean much to some of you but ask fans of the clubs they were associated with.
4: UEFA/FIFA concerns about government interference in football. Yet we have banning orders, Alcohol bans, reselling of tickets, kettling by police and other restrictions as a result of legislation that applies to football and not other sports.
5; The Premier League is great as it is. This is the Premier League that is so great some of its members were behind SuperLeague, Project Big Picture, 39th Game, selling property to themselves to avoid PSR breaches, 115 charges and so on.
I genuinely feel sorry for Richard Masters, he looked a mess at Parlisment on Tuesday, it’s not worth the £1.9m a year if the job is going to have such an impact on his wellbeing.
- Oct 20, 2022
- 4,982
- Thread starter
- #93
I thought this was a cross Party agreement this Bill?
Now ‘paused’ - whatever that will mean
https://news.sky.com/story/politics...lection-12593360?postid=7716200#liveblog-body
Edit:
Hansard proceedings from the last Committee hearing on 21 May
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commo...ad5571da/FootballGovernanceBill(SixthSitting)
Now ‘paused’ - whatever that will mean
https://news.sky.com/story/politics...lection-12593360?postid=7716200#liveblog-body
Edit:
Hansard proceedings from the last Committee hearing on 21 May
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commo...ad5571da/FootballGovernanceBill(SixthSitting)
Last edited: