Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Not good enough









Hiheidi

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2022
739
It is certainly an interesting correlation that our medical team depart in August, and within a couple of months injuries start piling up.

Also, I've seen it mentioned on Twitter, that the teams on the US tour (Brighton, Chelsea, Newcastle, Brentford) seem to be worse hit with injuries. Not sure if that could also be a factor? Interestingly, Chelsea were in the US the previous Summer, and suffered an injury crisis last season too.
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,264
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Why I mentioned maybe he left because not doing a great job. But if he left in like someone posted August then when can we stop blaming him
The salient point is what happened after he left. How long was there a vacancy? If we have a new guy is he in step with RDZ's training regime? If we don't, why not?

The old guy isn't the problem but may be a catalyst.

We've had a lot of injuries this season and it's very likely that they are for a large variety of reasons. March, for instance, was injured in an awkward fall in a game. Lamptey's always been made of glass, Gilmour was injured on the field on Scotland duty. Mitoma picked up a back problem after a long time with Japan.

Other things are less clear. Why did Enciso have a set back? Why did RDZ risk Estupinian at Ajax?

It's reasonable to conclude that there have been multiple reasons for our injuries and not just the training as Dwayne and Springal have claimed, isn't it?
 


Swegulls

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2023
598
Stockholm
It is certainly an interesting correlation that our medical team depart in August, and within a couple of months injuries start piling up.

Also, I've seen it mentioned on Twitter, that the teams on the US tour (Brighton, Chelsea, Newcastle, Brentford) seem to be worse hit with injuries. Not sure if that could also be a factor? Interestingly, Chelsea were in the US the previous Summer, and suffered an injury crisis last season too.
Those yanks, let's blame the US of A!! ;)
 




Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,264
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
It is certainly an interesting correlation that our medical team depart in August, and within a couple of months injuries start piling up.

Also, I've seen it mentioned on Twitter, that the teams on the US tour (Brighton, Chelsea, Newcastle, Brentford) seem to be worse hit with injuries. Not sure if that could also be a factor? Interestingly, Chelsea were in the US the previous Summer, and suffered an injury crisis last season too.
Liverpool and Spurs have had issues too.

It's a risk if you play possession football with pressing out of possession. You have to be very fit to do it. And we will never not play something in that style while Bloom's in charge.
 


chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
13,915
Luton have had more injuries than anyone and spent their pre-season in Colchester, Sheffield and Wolverhampton.
(All clubs have pre-season tours or 4-5 games against varied opposition, most are abroad in the PL, injuries are higher than last season across the board, some clubs have suffered more than others, there's unlikely to be a single answer)
 


Littlemo

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2022
1,227
It is certainly an interesting correlation that our medical team depart in August, and within a couple of months injuries start piling up.

Also, I've seen it mentioned on Twitter, that the teams on the US tour (Brighton, Chelsea, Newcastle, Brentford) seem to be worse hit with injuries. Not sure if that could also be a factor? Interestingly, Chelsea were in the US the previous Summer, and suffered an injury crisis last season too.

Could be, once you start making things more competitive then the players will try harder, friendlies are meant to be warm-ups really, not full on games.
 




pigmanovich

Active member
Mar 16, 2024
145
London
It is certainly an interesting correlation that our medical team depart in August, and within a couple of months injuries start piling up.

Also, I've seen it mentioned on Twitter, that the teams on the US tour (Brighton, Chelsea, Newcastle, Brentford) seem to be worse hit with injuries. Not sure if that could also be a factor? Interestingly, Chelsea were in the US the previous Summer, and suffered an injury crisis last season too.
Not concerning at all that we have the Euros and a preseason tour of Japan coming up, then!
 


pigmanovich

Active member
Mar 16, 2024
145
London
Luton have had more injuries than anyone and spent their pre-season in Colchester, Sheffield and Wolverhampton.
(All clubs have pre-season tours or 4-5 games against varied opposition, most are abroad in the PL, injuries are higher than last season across the board, some clubs have suffered more than others, there's unlikely to be a single answer)
Is that true though? This graphic is two months old but I'm not sure the injury landscape has changed dramatically.

1713177694934.png
 


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
70,321
If you think that strategy - selling several premium players at a vast profit, bringing through players on development, invest heavily in a loan /academy pathway and hope 1-2 come good each season and seek to buy players in different cheaper markets (South America, Denmark) or at end of careers (Welbeck, Lallana) rather than peak - is not the right one. Then what do you suggest changes ?
Is it just "buy more ready made replacements - don't sell your best players", and presumably "don't let them get injured".
Retention of our top talent is getting to be more and more of a problem, I'd hope you agree. Every time you don't replace them like-for-like the optimum starting eleven becomes weaker. It's why RDZ gets frustrated. He can't build anything. Tricky spiral to reverse I'd suggest
 






Exilegull

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2024
347
Retention of our top talent is getting to be more and more of a problem, I'd hope you agree. Every time you don't replace them like-for-like the optimum starting eleven becomes weaker. It's why RDZ gets frustrated. He can't build anything. Tricky trend to reverse I'd suggest
Then you need to develop players so they become like for like like we did last time. How do you think we reached that level last time around surely wasnt from signing ready made players took a year or more for Mac Allister Caicedo Trossard and others to reach the level they finally did tricky thing is to make breakthroughs align but think could happen already next year. Baleba could be closer to new Caicedo Adingra will have a year of PL experience behind him same with Joao Pedro Enciso would have gotten further already if not for injuries. Only max 10 managers in the world that will see their team replace star players with equally good players we cant expect to be one of the 10 clubs that can do it
 


Littlemo

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2022
1,227
Retention of our top talent is getting to be more and more of a problem, I'd hope you agree. Every time you don't replace them like-for-like the optimum starting eleven becomes weaker. It's why RDZ gets frustrated. He can't build anything. Tricky spiral to reverse I'd suggest

It is difficult but to be fair, RDZ has it better here than at most teams. Tony and Paul don’t want to sell players and will refuse bids (I.e Arsenal bidding for Caicedo) for them if they can. Not many clubs can afford to do that, even if they wanted to and many care a lot about making money. At Brighton, If Mac Allister said he wanted to stay here another year, he would still be here.

I think that sadly when the player makes it clear they want to leave, either through nice means (Mac Allister) or nasty (Trossard, Sanchez, Caicedo) then they will sell because a player who doesn’t want to play for us will often down tools or become a problem. Players want to see a pathway to bigger clubs and if we look like we will be difficult or block that, they won’t sign with us. We are attractive to young players because we produce players that the likes of Chelsea and Liverpool will buy.

I think that it’s only at that point will they try to maximise the price they get for the player,’once it’s clear they are going to go.
 




chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
13,915
Retention of our top talent is getting to be more and more of a problem, I'd hope you agree. Every time you don't replace them like-for-like the optimum starting eleven becomes weaker. It's why RDZ gets frustrated. He can't build anything. Tricky spiral to reverse I'd suggest
I'd say our recruitment strategy and approach is fine, working and for the long term. We didn't ditch it when Potter went months without winning and we won't ditch it because we've drawn away at Burnley and Brentford or because , some seasons, we're going to fall short. Of course its getting harder, its the Premier League, but if it wasn't working then we wouldn't have top talent that big clubs were keen on. They still are and that's the point.

Of course RDZ is frustrated and i imagine for all sorts of reasons. (although he went out of his way to praise Bloom and Barber at the weekend) One thing i'm pretty certain about though is , unless he's very naive , is that he is surprised at any of the above. He knew all of that before he put pen to paper. Everyone in football knows Brighton have a different strategy to a Chelsea , a Forest or a Villa. Isn't that why we wanted him and he wanted us. RDZ knows we sell players, recruit differently, and its his job to work within that model. So far itsworking fine but of course its not infaillbile - our signings aren't always going to be 100% in terms of the hit rate (eg: Dahoud, Ansu Fati) .

Hope he stays for next season and lets see where we get to in the remaining 6 games. But outside of the dressing room, then its a bit unbecoming for Brighton fans to be going round saying its "not good enough" or worse imo. We're Brighton, we have a bit more class...
 


chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
13,915
Is that true though? This graphic is two months old but I'm not sure the injury landscape has changed dramatically.
Luton have more players out currently that anyone else. According to https://www.premierinjuries.com/injury-table.php
but agreed - maybe not measured via minutes. Anyone point is - hard to draw many conclusions from idea that Albion on pre season tour in USA = injuries or that Luton on pre season tour in UK - also = injuries.
 


Hiheidi

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2022
739
Looking at the specifics of those Luton players, one is just a Man City player on loan who was unable to face his parent club - so not an injury.
 


chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
13,915
Looking at the specifics of those Luton players, one is just a Man City player on loan who was unable to face his parent club - so not an injury.
Hence difficulty of metrics for injuries but that wasn't my point anyway. Just that its far fetched to say the pre season tour in the USA is much of a factor - given that Luton were playing pre season friendlies in Wolverhampton and Burton on Trent and currently have > 10 players out.
 




GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,794
Gloucester
It's a combination of things for me.

1. Our CM is undeniably weaker. Gilmour and Gross have done a fine job of covering the gap but injuries and over working of Gross has finally caught up with us to show us what we already knew. Ali Mac and Caceido are massive misses and the next cabs off the rank aren't really there this time around.

2. Our left side last year was one of the best in world football. Estupinian currently looks like a Poundland version of himself and Mitoma hasn't really been around since Christmas. It's a shadow of what it was last season.

3. Enciso was unplayable at wolves then got injured. Pedro against Palace similarly. Injuries are one thing but the timing of them another. No Pedro for Wolves / Rome really cost us.

4. Ferguson has disappeared. Undav is banging goals in for Stuttgart. We've never under Potter or De Zerbi been a free scoring side when Moder has been in the side for whatever reason. We had to rely on clown show defending to get goals against Forest and Burnley. The drill before the game yesterday was worth watching. The finishing from everyone bar Welbeck was absolute pub team stuff. We just don't look like scoring. After I watched that I stuck a bet on Burnley to win.

5. De Zerbi has done himself no favours since Christmas. It's his job to get the best out of what we've got and he's spent too much time moaning about it. The tactics in Rome were naive in the extreme. He's been brilliant for most of his tenure but the version we've had for the last 3 months I'd rather went elsewhere next year if he wants to go.

Roll on August, a few new faces and a refreshed squad.
It's one hell of a leap (and one which I certainly don't get or agree to) to link Moder's presence in the side to our lack of ability to score goals!
 


Iggle Piggle

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2010
5,361
It's one hell of a leap (and one which I certainly don't get or agree to) to link Moder's presence in the side to our lack of ability to score goals!
It's true though. Moder got injured against Norwich forcing Potters hand to put Caceido in the team. We never looked back having scored 1 goal in the previous 7 losing only against Man city up to the end of the season and beating Arsenal, Man utd (4-0) and Spurs amongst others along the way.

It might be false equivalence but our current barn door tendancies have coincided with Moders -occasional - return.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here