Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

General Photography thread



Armchair

Member
Mar 3, 2009
36
Thanks for the advice here's a proper attempt! Snakes Head Fritillary.

fritillary.jpeg
 
















Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,725
Eastbourne
A Fuji XT5 and FX16-55 lens on this occasion. Wonderful cameras, I changed from Canon about 8 years ago.
Nice! I have a Fuji x-t1 and a Fuji x-t200. Both lovely cameras. I also use a Pentax K5 as I have a load of old Pentax prime lenses.

How do you find the x-t5? It's 40 mega pixels isn't it? I'd like that for cropping!
 


Armchair

Member
Mar 3, 2009
36
Nice! I have a Fuji x-t1 and a Fuji x-t200. Both lovely cameras. I also use a Pentax K5 as I have a load of old Pentax prime lenses.

How do you find the x-t5? It's 40 mega pixels isn't it? I'd like that for cropping!
I’ve recently upgraded from an XT2 which is also a great camera. The quality of the images is amazing and you can easily crop to 40% without losing much. Have to have plenty of storage because of the file size though. My first SLR was a Pentax and I’ve still got a couple of film bodies and some lenses. I bought an adapter to use the Pentax lenses with the Fuji which works well.
 




Colonel Mustard

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2023
2,050
I think the 'real' camera would have produced a better initial image. I use a Fuji mostly and its jpegs are famed for being great straight from the camera without any meddling. Phone software has less image quality in terms of clarity as it uses an inferior lens and the software tends to be a 'one size fits all' approach which kind of compresses the colours and contrast and makes a more flat image. That's my rather amateur away to describe it anyway. I slightly altered the phone image to put back a little more colour as the scene at the time was stunningly good. The rainbow for instance looked far more intense at that moment. It's really easy to overdo post processing, and if anything, I undercooked it as I dislike anything too obvious.
Cheers for the kind comments!

If you have Lightroom, you could try dehaze to brink up the contours and contrasts in the sky. I suspect PhotoShop etc. has something similar. Mind you, if it’s a jpeg the picture may not have captured enough digital data to work with.
 


Colonel Mustard

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2023
2,050
I’ve recently upgraded from an XT2 which is also a great camera. The quality of the images is amazing and you can easily crop to 40% without losing much. Have to have plenty of storage because of the file size though. My first SLR was a Pentax and I’ve still got a couple of film bodies and some lenses. I bought an adapter to use the Pentax lenses with the Fuji which works well.

My first SLR was a Pentax K1000. Great camera to learn on. Everything was manual of course.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
11,882
Cumbria
Here's 2 Panoramas from my recent South America trip. First one is Rio skyline and second one is from The Atacama desert in Chile.
Now processing 14000 pics from trip
View attachment 180468View attachment 180469
14,000! That's some going.

I've often wondered what I would have come back with after my year in Australia / New Zealand. I came back with hundreds of prints from my 36 frame reels, but was of course limited by this. So, photos were fewer and a bit more considered. No shooting 200 frames of a Galah to get the best one. Just took two and hoped one came out.

Good luck with the sorting and deleting!
 




Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,725
Eastbourne
I’ve recently upgraded from an XT2 which is also a great camera. The quality of the images is amazing and you can easily crop to 40% without losing much. Have to have plenty of storage because of the file size though. My first SLR was a Pentax and I’ve still got a couple of film bodies and some lenses. I bought an adapter to use the Pentax lenses with the Fuji which works well.
My first SLR was a Pentax K1000. Great camera to learn on. Everything was manual of course.
I've also used an adapter for the Fujis with my vintage lenses with great success. I bought the Pentax K5 second hand, which is fairly old and lacks some features, but still takes fine pictures. It's nice not to bother with adapters and simply use the lens natively.

My first camera was a Zenith EM which I quickly upgraded to a Pentax ME Super when I was 16.
 


shingle

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2004
3,141
Lewes
I've also used an adapter for the Fujis with my vintage lenses with great success. I bought the Pentax K5 second hand, which is fairly old and lacks some features, but still takes fine pictures. It's nice not to bother with adapters and simply use the lens natively.

My first camera was a Zenith EM which I quickly upgraded to a Pentax ME Super when I was 16.
My first camera was a Zenith E in '78, followed by the afforementioned Pentax K1000 which I had to flog in Stockholm when I ran out of money, after that a Nikon EM which I had to flog in Spain when I again ran out of money. Then Contax RTS 2 (lovely camera) after that all medium format cameras Pentax 6x7, Mamiya RB 67, then the Bronica GS1 and then The Mamiya 7 ii (again beautiful camera) got so much travel work with it.

Finally, now I only have the superb Fujifilm x100v (eh CM) which I carry everywhere and The Sony A7R3a with F2.8 Sigma 24-70 zoom.


 
Last edited:


shingle

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2004
3,141
Lewes
14,000! That's some going.

I've often wondered what I would have come back with after my year in Australia / New Zealand. I came back with hundreds of prints from my 36 frame reels, but was of course limited by this. So, photos were fewer and a bit more considered. No shooting 200 frames of a Galah to get the best one. Just took two and hoped one came out.

Good luck with the sorting and deleting!
14000 is seven weeks of taking pics all day every day, 1200 of those were in just one night. I had been given a press pass for the Carnival del Pais in Gualeguaychu in Argentina which meant I could stand on the corsodrome track as the 5 hour procession of dancers and floats came by. So much bare flesh, I'd post some on here but I think that they're probably NSFW.:blush::blush:
 




Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
11,882
Cumbria
14000 is seven weeks of taking pics all day every day, 1200 of those were in just one night. I had been given a press pass for the Carnival del Pais in Gualeguaychu in Argentina which meant I could stand on the corsodrome track as the 5 hour procession of dancers and floats came by. So much bare flesh, I'd post some on here but I think that they're probably NSFW.:blush::blush:
What a job!
 


shingle

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2004
3,141
Lewes
If you have Lightroom, you could try dehaze to brink up the contours and contrasts in the sky. I suspect PhotoShop etc. has something similar. Mind you, if it’s a jpeg the picture may not have captured enough digital data to work with.
Going back to what CM said earlier regarding the Lightroom tools for photo enhancement, here's an example, again the pic was taken in Rio looking the other way (some might recognise it from The James Bond film). This is only for the less experienced photogs on this thread, I don't mean to tell the more experienced how to suck eggs.

Anyway, the first example is straight out of the camera and the 2nd is after 3 or 4 mins using Lightroom tools including the dehaze tool. But as CM says, the image file must be a 'raw' file as this file will have all the digital data to work with. Final words, if you're serious, subscribe to Lightroom Classic, its brilliant
Rio - Panorama-8-2.jpg
Rio - Panorama-8.jpg
 




Publius Ovidius

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,070
at home








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here