Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Was it a penalty?

Was it a penalty?


  • Total voters
    403
  • Poll closed .






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
It wasn’t a goal scoring opportunity, he didn’t do it on purpose

Neither of those things stop something being a penalty.

Not that I think it was. But it's not the worst decision I've seen and I don't think VAR could overturn it.
 


Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
42,829
Lancing
Of course it was a penalty, 100%
 


Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,297
Official site commentator said surprised VAR didn’t overturn it as got the ball… mmm… if the rule is about taking the ball, it’s def no pen. Not as clean cut as some on this thread are suggesting for me - I’ve changed to no pen. That said, the ref was biased as f*** and couldn’t wait to give it.
 






tigertim68

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2012
2,337
the ref couldn’t wait to give Arsenal a free kick after 30 seconds after the match started,
and it continued throughout the first half especially, and as for the penalty, couldn’t wait to blow his whistle, was always going to give it ,
 


Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
7,328
Vilamoura, Portugal
Before pro Arsenal viewpoints pile in, please remember the benchmark from some experts that Doku got some the ball before his studs struck MacA …. their conclusion that getting to the ball first meant it was not a foul.
and that's why I say no penalty. Did PGMOL say the Doku decision was incorrect? If not, this is not a penalty. Check badge should not be part of the decision-making process.
 








METALMICKY

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2004
6,091
the ref couldn’t wait to give Arsenal a free kick after 30 seconds after the match started,
and it continued throughout the first half especially, and as for the penalty, couldn’t wait to blow his whistle, was always going to give it ,
First half he was shocking and that ridiculous free kick signalled the start of it.
 


Flounce

Well-known member
Nov 15, 2006
1,150
Umpire’s call for me, VAR isn’t overturning the on-field decision whichever way the ref calls it. You could make a case either way but I neither think it’s a ‘stonewall penatly’ nor a travesty of justice.
Sadly the “umpire’s call” is too often a favour the big club call imo. I am pretty certain that penalty would not have been given if it was in the Arsenal box at 0-0.

Yeah, I am a biased cynic and thought the ref gave everything he could to Arsenal in the first half, and the speed with which he pointed to the spot for the pen was telling. It was just before that that he ignored a two handed push in the back on Enciso wasn’t it? Awful ref and no surprise given his mind boggling line drawing at Palace when he was on VAR.
 




Happy Exile

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 19, 2018
1,874
Sadly the “umpire’s call” is too often a favour the big club call imo. I am pretty certain that penalty would not have been given if it was in the Arsenal box at 0-0.

Yeah, I am a biased cynic and thought the ref gave everything he could to Arsenal in the first half, and the speed with which he pointed to the spot for the pen was telling.
My mate in the Arsenal end said they had a laugh about how much quicker we were being flagged offside each time compared to them.
 




Wan Bassaka’s yesterday was way less of a penalty than Lamptey’s - tho I’m sure no one cares about that 🤣

still rightly given tho
 




dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
52,565
Burgess Hill
Welbeck was blatantly fouled (pulled back) in the initial (pre) build-up to their second goal (just outside their box).........far more annoying than the penalty decision
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
55,789
Back in Sussex










Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
Oct 4, 2003
11,123


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here