Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)







Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
5,348
Not a big fan of "call me Dave", but like and agree with his sentiments here.

Hopefully Speaker Johnson can be brought into his 'big society'!


Did you see he used the Trump signature hand gesture at 1:48? He's talking to Trump in his own sign language.

He's pushing Trump's 'everyone needs to pay their bills' routine. That should go down a storm with the orange one.
 




raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
5,686
Wiltshire
Wow, fingers crossed. There were allegedly a lot of ordinance fired in the area. If they took out a load of aircraft that will be as huge to Ukraine as it will be devastating to the Russian commander responsible for the airfield (avoid windows above the ground floor)
As per Reuters... six at least 🤞🏻
"
  • Ukraine attacked Russia's Morozovsk military air base in the Rostov region, destroying six Russian warplanes in a joint operation conducted by the SBU security service and military, a Kyiv intelligence source told Reuters.
 






Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
5,348
As previously reported, Nato met to ringfence and Trump-proof aid to Ukraine.
Stoltenberg has already called for more effort from Nato member nations to help Ukraine.

Cameron's walk through the impressive Nato complex was a strong message to all audiences - Ukraine, Putin, US Congress, Trump, EU, domestic UK audience etc.
It was a shame about the slip up near the end. Other than that, it was a polished performance.

Now to the small matter of delivery. After that message, I can't see Nato members not delivering, in that they - should - contribute at least 2% of GDP.

It will be interesting to see how Trump reacts. Will he be pleased? Or will he find some other reason to stir the pot?
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
1,317
in a house
Now to the small matter of delivery. After that message, I can't see Nato members not delivering, in that they - MUST - contribute at least 2% of GDP.

It will be interesting to see how Trump reacts. Will he be pleased? Or will he find some other reason to stir the pot?
Slight edit to strengthen comment.
 
Last edited:


sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
12,519
Hove
The good thing is that Trump cannot pull the US out of NATO without a 2/3rds Senate approval.

The bad thing is that he could still refuse an Article 5 call to arms although the pressure on him at that point may just make that temporary.

I hope that we don't get to find out.
 






GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,793
Gloucester
As previously reported, Nato met to ringfence and Trump-proof aid to Ukraine.
Stoltenberg has already called for more effort from Nato member nations to help Ukraine.

Cameron's walk through the impressive Nato complex was a strong message to all audiences - Ukraine, Putin, US Congress, Trump, EU, domestic UK audience etc.
It was a shame about the slip up near the end. Other than that, it was a polished performance.

Now to the small matter of delivery. After that message, I can't see Nato members not delivering, in that they - should - contribute at least 2% of GDP.

It will be interesting to see how Trump reacts. Will he be pleased? Or will he find some other reason to stir the pot?
Trump will always find a (totally spurious) reason to 'stir the pot'. Needs taking out as much as Putin - he's a danger to the world too.
 


















vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
27,900
That was a very busy night. Trying to get my head around the logistical planning of multiple drones being sent to multiple sites, each being programmed and presumably camera-operator controlled in the final minutes: excellent planning and execution.
It's a massive undertaking but swamping a target with multiple drones increases the likelihood of success as air defence systems expend their missiles. Drones costing a few £Thou getting knocked out by missiles costing £100 thou is still a win for Ukraine..
 


raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
5,686
Wiltshire
It's a massive undertaking but swamping a target with multiple drones increases the likelihood of success as air defence systems expend their missiles. Drones costing a few £Thou getting knocked out by missiles costing £100 thou is still a win for Ukraine..
It is indeed, and sounds like there was major success in terms of destruction of Russian planes.
The current expensive method of knocking drones from the sky with missiles also counts against Ukraine's defense costs as well of course.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here