Historically the political debate has been much more overly aggressive. Yet even now I see more overly aggressive 'discussion' than overly 'offended' responses. I don't recognise the culture war between broflakes and snowflakes.
.jpg?quality=80&format=jpg&crop=0,0,1687,3000&resize=crop)
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
"Michael Gove has said remarks made by the Conservative party’s largest donor were “horrific” but were unlikely to be referred to the government’s new extremism taskforce.
£15m apparently. Seemingly he donated a further £5m in the last 6 months that is yet to be recorded.
'Cancel culture' is such a load of old shite. No-one gets ACTUALLY 'cancelled'. If someone or something does something wrong they get rightly punished, but not actually 'cancelled' by the definition of that phenomenon.I’m confused:
Tories - “We are opposed to Cancel Culture and insist that free-speech is sacrosanct. Instead of being easily offended snowflakes, people need to become more tolerant and resilient.”
Tories - “We consider many views that we disagree with, and those who hold such views, to be extremist or undemocratic, and we will therefore ban them.”
So the conclusion we draw is that you can be racist (or Islamaphobic or anti-semitic or homophobic) but as long as you say "sorry" and give the Tories £10m, everything is forgiven and forgotten.
Oh-oh. They gonna be coming for me for aligning myself with the "Plough them all into a ditch" campaign.
I think you'll find this is not new news.
Which was probably taken out of the £400million profit he made?Wrong!
It's £15m to wipe the slate clean apparently
Or as long as you say it as an individual, rather than as part of a group. Even if all your mates are saying exactly the same thing.
Tough one. I think I'd have to say The Best of The Beatles.
