Possibly. Although they are standing full on to the image - and therefore their legs are an inverted V. JPVH is standing much more at a sideways stance, so a straighter leg.
I wouldn't mind an occasional error but we had FIVE written apologies last season where the ref and VAR got it wrong. Palace, Spurs, and three others. This season it has been admitted that two of Villa's six goals should've been ruled out, and, yes, you could say we were beaten 4-0 but goals change games. Heads drop, marking gets laxer as players tire whereas if you are still in the game, you still have adrenalin to boost you to try harder.
Yep, he's offside
I don't think he was offside.
Let’s see how we feel if we win the return leg by 3 goals. Unlikely but not impossible considering the number of clubs we’ve put 3 or 4 past
Because we were so shite we'd have conceded anyway.
I think it was two written apologies, one at Palace and one at Spurs. There were others that people felt were wrong but they were not actual apologies.
Just another view point. More than happy to be told why this is nonsense. I have taken your image above where you place dots for points of reference for VH and Mancini. In the first image below I have drawn a black line to follow the white line already on the pitch in your image.
That red line is to the right of Dunk's foot, and to the right of van Hecke's foot.
Well, I can't find them. 442 listed two, which other written apologies were there?
That's why I've demonstrated the wiggle room to account for the fact that angle will change the nearer you get to the edge of the box. However the incident happened much nearer the penalty spot line than the edge of the box.
Agree it was a very poor effort defensively but still, just before that goal was wrongly allowed and despite the precarious defence, we had a good period of possession that looked like we might be coming back into it. Once the goal was given, the wheels completely came off. Had it been rightly disallowed, some hope would have flooded back in.
