Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Misc] King Charles has cancer



dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
52,512
Burgess Hill
It isn't.

Our cancer detection rates are so bad in this country, millions will be making the same comparison.

All of my older family members were/are staunch royalists. They've said the same tonight.

The reality is that Charles statistically has a far better chance of survival the vast majority of the population because of private care, early diagnosis and treatment.

Them the facts.
See #55
 




peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
11,366
Why? It’s pretty clear he’ll get through it. Hundreds of people get this news every day. He’s at the front of the queue for treatment isn’t he?
I wish King well and am not making light of this heinous disease, but I'm genuienly not sure he'll even be in a queue?, not like he's going to be added to the Windsor general hospital waiting list.

He'll be off to Harley Street to see the countries leading oncologists, no doubt?
 






hart's shirt

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2003
10,200
Kitbag in Dubai
The fact that Charles is King doesn't make me wish him any more or any less good health than anyone else with the disease.

Whilst I appreciate that he is clearly at an advantage with regards to healthcare, cancer itself doesn't discriminate.

The openness with which things are being discussed is commendable and will hopefully encourage others.

Royalist, Republican or somewhere in the middle, one can hope for a speedy recovery regardless.
 




Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,213
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
It isn't.

Our cancer detection rates are so bad in this country, millions will be making the same comparison.

All of my older family members were/are staunch royalists. They've said the same tonight.

The reality is that Charles statistically has a far better chance of survival the vast majority of the population because of private care, early diagnosis and treatment.

Them the facts.
Exactly this (plus he’s got no money worries so no additional stress making him more ill, which is what’s happening to so many working class people).

I’ll leave it there. Either you get it or you don’t.
 


One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
21,641
Worthing

There is little if anything to choose between a private and NHS cancer pathway in terms of speed of treatment, in fact some local private hospitals will transfer patients back to the NHS.

The NHS will do their utmost to get patients a treatment decision within 28 days and first definitive treatment within 62 days.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,543
West is BEST
Exactly this (plus he’s got no money worries so no additional stress making him more ill, which is what’s happening to so many working class people).

I’ll leave it there. Either you get it or you don’t.


Long term, you’re right.

I just think we should first and foremost treat him as a person. In this situation.

Scary to be told you have cancer.
 




clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,339
Exactly this (plus he’s got no money worries so no additional stress making him more ill, which is what’s happening to so many working class people).

I’ll leave it there. Either you get it or you don’t.
Having lived and breathed the terrible fall out of a missed diagnosis of a family member (one of the reasons I am yet to return to the Amex since pre-pandemic) I very much get it and will continue to post what I like.

The main reason the Palace released this news was to add to the conversation and this is the conversation.

Get well soon Charles, anyone with half a brain cell knows this isn't about him as a person.
 




One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
21,641
Worthing
It isn't.

Our cancer detection rates are so bad in this country, millions will be making the same comparison.

All of my older family members were/are staunch royalists. They've said the same tonight.

The reality is that Charles statistically has a far better chance of survival the vast majority of the population because of private care, early diagnosis and treatment.

Them the facts.
If it’s detected early enough it is, the actual treatment side as per my earlier post is comparable.

That is why screening has an important role and things like Targeted Lung Health Checks and FIT are very important.

The whole because he’s the King argument is basically bollocks. Early detection is the issue, if anyone has a raised PSA and see the GP, they’ll get referred, and likely to get an MRI after inspection.

I am sure Charles like anyone else had an MRI and thankfully it has showed an associated issue at an early stage.
 
Last edited:




The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,543
West is BEST
I know people with plenty of money and had all the care in the world. They died of cancer.

Cancer doesn’t check your bank balance.

Yes, he’ll likely get the best care available.

Doesn’t help that much with cancer.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
1 in 2 people will be diagnosed with cancer.

About 67% of cancer survivors have survived 5 or more years after diagnosis. About 18% of cancer survivors have survived 20 or more years after diagnosis. 64% of survivors are age 65 or older.
 






clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,339
If it’s detected early enough it is, the actual treatment side as per my earlier post is comparable.

That is why screening has an important role and things like Targeted Lung Health Checks and FIT are very important.

The whole because he’s the King argument is basically bollocks. Early detection is the issue, if anyone has a raised PSA and see the GP, they’ll get referred, and likely to get an MRI after inspection.

I am sure Charles like anyone else had an MRI and thankfully it has showed an issue at an early stage.

Irrelevant to what happened to us and the fall out was horrific. I'm not going into details and neither am I going to be lectured regarding "early detection".
 




Nobby

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2007
2,622
I wish King well and am not making light of this heinous disease, but I'm genuienly not sure he'll even be in a queue?, not like he's going to be added to the Windsor general hospital waiting list.

He'll be off to Harley Street to see the countries leading oncologists, no doubt?
Yep
But the thing is his cancer cells don’t know he’s the King
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I know people with plenty of money and had all the care in the world. They died of cancer.

Cancer doesn’t check your bank balance.

Yes, he’ll likely get the best care available.

Doesn’t help that much with cancer.
That’s why I made the point about King George VI dying at 52, and looked up Princess Margaret who died at 71.
of course, they both smoked but all the money and top doctors couldn’t allow them to live longer.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
64,089
Withdean area
One nonsense thing on the BBC News just now, the presenter suggested that the heavy workload since becoming king might’ve brought about the disease, a view then kind of shared by the posh ‘royals expert’.

No one will ever know. Long term stress may well be a factor for anyone, but what a silly proposition at this moment.
 


AmexRuislip

Trainee Spy 🕵️‍♂️
Feb 2, 2014
33,824
Ruislip
Irrelevant to what happened to us and the fall out was horrific. I'm not going into details and neither am I going to be lectured regarding "early detection".
I don't think that @One Teddy Maybank is lecturing you.
They're just stating a fact that if you have a suspected cancer, then early screening is a great option for ALL. :thumbsup:
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here