Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,084


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,332
[tweet]1214925627809251328[/tweet]

it would seem inevitable they would vote against an amendment that would implement a directive that UK opted out from. an awkward subject, on the surface its very harsh to not allow a child to bring their parents once they've been granted residency, on the other hand creates an incentive for people to send their children off in the hope they will.
 






Jan 30, 2008
31,981
it would seem inevitable they would vote against an amendment that would implement a directive that UK opted out from. an awkward subject, on the surface its very harsh to not allow a child to bring their parents once they've been granted residency, on the other hand creates an incentive for people to send their children off in the hope they will.

THIS, a dispicable way of gaining a "cheap British passport" .
regards
DF
 




Grombleton

Surrounded by <div>s
Dec 31, 2011
7,356
THIS, a dispicable way of gaining a "cheap British passport" .
regards
DF

The ones that aren't even made in the country?

Christ it's far too easy to point out how dim you are. At least give us something to work with, if that doesn't cause you too much trauma.
 




Klaas

I've changed this
Nov 1, 2017
2,568


Klaas

I've changed this
Nov 1, 2017
2,568


Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,090
The arse end of Hangleton
It’s not illegal to travel all the way to the U.K. to seek asylum.

I'm not going to comment on the amendment as I don't know enough about it but the rules of asylum are that it is claimed in the first safe country the claimant arrives in. It's a bit of a push to suggest that would ever be the UK .... unless of course the French are suddenly in need of asylum ?
 






Jan 30, 2008
31,981
5 years old video. Tiring work being an internet racist eh Das Reich?

nothing to do with being an internet racist ,its still going on today but you know that ,:wink: seems like you're defending them and find it all rather acceptable, it's your ilk that just encourage more of it:dunce:
regards
DF
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,601
West is BEST
I'm not going to comment on the amendment as I don't know enough about it but the rules of asylum are that it is claimed in the first safe country the claimant arrives in. It's a bit of a push to suggest that would ever be the UK .... unless of course the French are suddenly in need of asylum ?

As far as I’m aware it’s not illegal to claim asylum in the U.K, whatever your country of origin or route to get here. Of course, you’re not guaranteed to be granted asylum but I don’t think it’s illegal to apply.
 




Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,090
The arse end of Hangleton
As far as I’m aware it’s not illegal to claim asylum in the U.K, whatever your country of origin or route to get here. Of course, you’re not guaranteed to be granted asylum but I don’t think it’s illegal to apply.

International law states you should claim asylum in the first 'safe' country you can get to. Let's take valid asylum seekers from say Libya or Syria using a boat to get to the UK - and I have no issue with them claiming asylum - they will have to pass Cyprus ( EU member ), Greece ( EU member ), south coast of France ( EU member ), south of Spain ( EU member ), Portugal ( EU member ), north of Spain ( EU member ) and north coast of France ( EU member ) ...... so plenty of safe countries to claim asylum. Why the UK ? Even if you take out the sea voyage there are plenty of safe countries before you get to the UK.
 




Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,353
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
International law states you should claim asylum in the first 'safe' country you can get to. Let's take valid asylum seekers from say Libya or Syria using a boat to get to the UK - and I have no issue with them claiming asylum - they will have to pass Cyprus ( EU member ), Greece ( EU member ), south coast of France ( EU member ), south of Spain ( EU member ), Portugal ( EU member ), north of Spain ( EU member ) and north coast of France ( EU member ) ...... so plenty of safe countries to claim asylum. Why the UK ? Even if you take out the sea voyage there are plenty of safe countries before you get to the UK.

Surely if you are a child then a country that contains your adult relatives is safe and one that doesn’t is not - or not as. Where I’d concede is that the perils of the additional journey would negate that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 




The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,601
West is BEST
International law states you should claim asylum in the first 'safe' country you can get to. Let's take valid asylum seekers from say Libya or Syria using a boat to get to the UK - and I have no issue with them claiming asylum - they will have to pass Cyprus ( EU member ), Greece ( EU member ), south coast of France ( EU member ), south of Spain ( EU member ), Portugal ( EU member ), north of Spain ( EU member ) and north coast of France ( EU member ) ...... so plenty of safe countries to claim asylum. Why the UK ? Even if you take out the sea voyage there are plenty of safe countries before you get to the UK.

Yeah, you’re definitely right about first place of safety. And that’s hard to disagree with. What I’m saying, but probably not explaining myself very well, is that I don’t think it’s actually illegal to try and seek asylum in any country, whatever regions one has passed through. I don’t imagine it would be looked upon favourably if you had passed through several safe countries before reaching the U.K. but I should think we have a duty of care once they have landed on British soil.
 














Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here