Conspiracy Theorists

[Guinness Boy]

Well done for spotting some users that were banned years before your join date, which one are you a reincarnation of?

He's a reincarnation of Falmer, Rosa and The Truth at bare minimum.

 

[Guinness Boy]

One piece of wreckage found, How convenient.for them.

You've had 2 days and that's all you've got?

You obviously didn't click the snopes link as that precise response is dealt with.

6) Can you explain why the County Fire Chief could not tell reporters where the aircraft was?

The exact quote offered here was:

When asked by a journalist: “Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?”

“First of all, the question about the aircraft, there are some small pieces of aircraft visible from the interior during this fire-fighting operation I’m talking about, but not large sections. In other words, there’s no fuselage sections and that sort of thing.” “You know, I’d rather not comment on that. We have a lot of eyewitnesses that can give you better information about what actually happened with the aircraft as it approached. So we don’t know. I don’t know.”
The fire chief wasn’t asked “where the aircraft was”; he was asked “Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?” He did indeed provide an answer to the question he was asked: There were no large sections of the plane left by the time he was asked (the day after the attack) because they had been smashed into smaller pieces by the impact and then burned up; all that remained were smaller pieces visible only from the interior of the Pentagon

 

[Triggaaar]

I find it strange how the whole event was broadcasted across the world on every tv station.

Really? I was working in a bank in London that day (back end, not one with customers) and in the small area where I was whoever was in charge chose to put it on a large screen and we all stopped to watch. Everyone wanted to watch, it was massive shocking news. It would be weird if every news team in NY didn't go and film it. An aircraft had flown into one of America's famous skyscrapers and it was burning.

Even so there had never been a skyscraper brought down by a plane before in history, it was as if the media knew the buildings were going to collapse once the aeroplanes had hit the buildings hence why it was being filmed worldwide.

No that doesn't make sense. If the buildings hadn't collapsed, the news story would still have been massive and filmed by everyone. And I don't think any other skyscraper in history has been hit by a jumbo jet, so obviously none had collapsed before.

There were people throwing themselves off the building and yet our media filmed all of it to us? Why did the media think the whole world needed to see these specific horrors live with a running commentary on it from every channel?

I don't actually know if the coverage was on every channel, the kids tv channels, all the sports channels etc. Didn't the media also film Grenfell tower recently? That was obviously a much smaller story with no suggestion of terrorism etc, but there were news crews there filming, which could have seen people jumping from the building.

Usually when horrific situations like that happens, they don't suddenly takeover every tv channel

Can you give some examples of event like that which haven't demanded so much media attention?

What happened to the ''viewers may find this disturbing' consideration?

I've no idea. Have you watched all of the live footage back to check nothing was said?

Children, men and women were practically being forced to watch traumatising events which would've had damaging mental effects on a lot of the viewers, especially the kids who just got home from school.

The news was happening before kids came home from school, the parents already knew and had the choice whether to let the kids watch tv or not. I didn't have kids at school then, but I imagine it's all anyone at the playground during pickup time talked about. No one was forced to watch it. I wasn't traumatised by anything I saw.

It was so bizarre and weird when it was on all our tv channels. Of course it was a massive attack and it's not normal to see two planes fly into separate buildings full of people, but why didn't it stay within just the news channels considering how disturbing the viewing actually turned out to be?

Some channels have lighthearted chat shows on, and continuing with some of those would be inappropriate and insulting to those who were dying in an ongoing attack. I'd have thought it ok to carry on with kids TV channels, I don't know they were stopped.

But regardless, what has this got to do with who was behind the attacks? If the US government had any knowledge of (or involvement in) the attacks, they'd be keeping it as quiet as possible, not calling all media and telling them.

It was a bit like taking alook at the aftermath of a car crash and bringing your kids along to see too, but obviously on a much smaller fractal.

It wasn't. I don't recall seeing anything particularly graphic on that day, nothing worse than I've seen on other occasions where there has been an attack or natural disaster. I don't let my kids watch the news, because the stories don't tend to be jolly, parents did not have to let their children see the news that day.

 

[Triggaaar]

One piece of wreckage found, How convenient.for them.

However many pieces of wreckage they found wouldn't satisfy you, so what's your point?

 

[Megazone]

It wasn't. I don't recall seeing anything particularly graphic on that day, nothing worse than I've seen on other occasions where there has been an attack or natural disaster. I don't let my kids watch the news, because the stories don't tend to be jolly, parents did not have to let their children see the news that day.

Really? From what I can remember from that day, I got home from school with my siblings (parents were still at work) and we were watching kids Tv when suddenly all the TVs stations started showing us 2 buildings on fire with a planes cradhed into them. We witnessed people jumping from the building holding hands together whilst they fell to their death. They were filming these horrors close up. We had no warning of what we were watching. The grenfall tower fire was obviously a dreadful disaster to happen but the graphic the viewing was nothing compared to what was being filmed on 9/11. Plus, I don't think the granfall tiwer disaster was filmed live worldwide on every TV station.

 

[Triggaaar]

Really? From what I can remember from that day, I got home from school with my siblings (parents were still at work) and we were watching kids Tv when suddenly all the TVs stations started showing us 2 buildings on fire with a planes cradhed into them.

Fair enough, I didn't know that happened. Were you watching one of the 4 main channels, or Sky/cable? I can understand the main 4 channels covering it, but wouldn't expect Nickleodeon/the Disney channel etc to show it.

We witnessed people jumping from the building holding hands together whilst they fell to their death. They were filming these horrors close up. We had no warning of what we were watching.

Understood, I guess it was something that had more of an effect on you at the time than me, as I was older and choosing to watch it.

Perhaps the channels showing it instead of kids TV should have had permanent warnings on the screen or something. That's a question for Ofcom and the news editors of the time though, it's got nothing to do with whether the US government had anything to do with it.

The grenfall tower fire was obviously a dreadful disaster to happen but the graphic the viewing was nothing compared to what was being filmed on 9/11.

As above, I accept your word for that, as I don't remember the graphic footage.

Plus, I don't think the granfall tiwer disaster was filmed live worldwide on every TV station.

Well obviously, the Grenfell disaster was a relatively small building with a kitchen fire, which isn't quite the news story of 4 passenger jets destroying the World Trade Centre and damaging the Pentagon. The point is that for such a disaster you'd expect there to be mass coverage.

 

[brighton fella]

However many pieces of wreckage they found wouldn't satisfy you, so what's your point?

No, I would have been half satisfied had i seen something resembling a wing but instead we got shown nothing apart from a pathetic piece of wreckage found isolated and away from everything else.,

Strange too was the fact that the surrounding lawns were found unscathed just after impact, and how handy it was too that the entire cctv system was not in operation that day... Had it of been these mysteries could have been explained..

 

[BadFish]

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wise people so full of doubts.”

For some reason the Bertrand Russell quote keeps popping into my head while reading this thread.

 

[BadFish]

So enough of 9/11, where do we all stand on the flat earth conspiracy?

I reckon it is definately flat, otherwise we'd all fall off. NASA have been fooling us for years because........... erm...........to get us to.......... oh..........................erm.

Brighton Fella, you must be all over this one?

 

[Megazone]

No, I would have been half satisfied had i seen something resembling a wing but instead we got shown nothing apart from a pathetic piece of wreckage found isolated and away from everything else.,

Strange too was the fact that the surrounding lawns were found unscathed just after impact, and how handy it was too that the entire cctv system was not in operation that day... Had it of been these mysteries could have been explained..

Watch this video of some of the live news reporting going on as it happened that day. It's a YouTube video so no doubt it'll already have been written off by the 'intheknow' religion, but there's footage and commentary done by the main News channels that day which dont match the official version of events.

 

[BadFish]

So of the three of you, one thinks there was no planes, one thinks there was drones and one thinks there was military planes.

Why don't you argue with each other? Only the sheeple?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Edit; the last video is the drones theory too, i stand corrected.

 

[Megazone]

So enough of 9/11, where do we all stand on the flat earth conspiracy?

I reckon it is definately flat, otherwise we'd all fall off. NASA have been fooling us for years because........... erm...........to get us to.......... oh..........................erm.

Brighton Fella, you must be all over this one?

Are you kidding?

There's people all over the globe who can prove it's flat!

 

[Megazone]

So of the three of you, one thinks there was no planes, one thinks there was drones and one thinks there was military planes.

Why don't you argue with each other? Only the sheeple?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Edit; the last video is the drones theory too, i stand corrected.

The YouTube video I put up is basically reshowing what some of the news stations reported to us that day as it happened.

Do you think they were in on the conspiracy too? Do you think FOX news reported these stories because they are tinfoil hatters as well ?

 

[BadFish]

The YouTube video I put up is basically reshowing what some of the news stations reported to us that day as it happened.

Do you think they were in on the conspiracy too? Do you think FOX news reported these stories as they are tinfoil hatters too?

So you think that there were planes but they were not airliners? Do you think theyt were military planes or drones?

I am struggling with the footage, especially the bit where the woman says "that was not an American Airlines.....". If you watched a plane crash into a building you would hardly start shouting about what it isn't.

So much doctored footage out there, Colinz has shown us lots of videos about how easy it is to do.This is why endless you tube clips are unreliable in terms of evidence. You even went as far as say that the footage was bonafide when you posted it. Why? because you know it is unreliable.

 

[Megazone]

So you think that there were planes but they were not airliners? Do you think theyt were military planes or drones?

Sorry if I've confused you, but the YouTube video has a collection of official live news reportings of the 9/11 events.

No where in the video does 'what I think' come into play. Ive just put up stuff which was officially being reported at the time?

Talk about swerving the point....

 

[BadFish]

Sorry if I've confused you, but the YouTube video has a collection of official live news reportings of the 9/11 events.

No where in the video does 'what I think' come into play. Ive just put up stuff which was officially being reported at the time?

Talk about swerving the point....

Classic conspiracy theory nutjob tactic. Post a youtube video without context or hypothesis in the hope that the fact that you really have no idea what your talking about will not be exposed.

And then talk about swerving the point

You haven't changed (only your user name of course)

Your first job is to prove that the youtube footage you are posting has not been doctored (its easy to do as Colinz told us).

Second thing is to tell me what you think the footage proves.

Shit or get off the pot.

 

[LlcoolJ]

So of the three of you, one thinks there was no planes, one thinks there was drones and one thinks there was military planes.

Why don't you argue with each other? Only the sheeple?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

It's quite surreal isn't it?

Ah, no I meant its total ****wittery.

Not surreal.

 

[Megazone]

Classic conspiracy theory nutjob tactic. Post a youtube video without context or hypothesis in the hope that the fact that you really have no idea what your talking about will not be exposed.

And then talk about swerving the point

You haven't changed (only your user name of course)

Your first job is to prove that the youtube footage you are posting has not been doctored (its easy to do as Colinz told us).

Second thing is to tell me what you think the footage proves.

Shit or get off the pot.

Read back what you've just typed Badfish. It's not very nice is it? It's actually a bit sad and I'm actually starting to feel a bit sorry for you now. If you want to keep up with these petty arguments you are so obviously scratching for right now, I'm sorry but I'm not going to feed you with the negativity your subconscious is sadly seeking. The fact you've got very personal and aggressive over me showing official live news reportings of 9/11, shows that you only like these debates so you can vent and project your personal issues onto some stranger online where you won't have to deal with guilt/emotion of how you are treating a fellow human being. It's a weak way of coping with a form of depression and it won't get any better until you realise what you are doing.

For your own sake Badfish, Being nice is sometimes more important than being right.

 

[BadFish]

Read back what you've just typed Badfish. It's not very nice is it? It's actually a bit sad and I'm actually starting to feel a bit sorry for you now. If you want to keep up with these petty arguments you are so obviously scratching for right now, I'm sorry but I'm not going to feed you with the negativity your subconscious seem is sadly seeking. The fact you've got very personal and aggressive over me showing official live news reportings of 9/11, shows that you only like these debates so you can vent and project your personal issues onto some stranger online where you won't have to deal with guilt/emotion of how you are treating a fellow human being. It's a weak way of coping with a form of depression and it won't get any better until you realise what you are doing.

For your own sake Badfish, Being nice is sometimes more important than being right.

Ha ha ha, and now cod psychology to avoid the discussion.

I call The Truth bingo!!

Phew, you nearly had to provide some substance on this thread.



Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

 

[Triggaaar]

No, I would have been half satisfied had i seen something resembling a wing

The wings hit some very solid building, and they were full of fuel, I don't suppose they last long.

but instead we got shown nothing apart from a pathetic piece of wreckage found isolated and away from everything else

So you'd have liked them to place it closer to the building

Strange too was the fact that the surrounding lawns were found unscathed just after impact

Please show me decent evidence of this - where you can see exactly where the lawns are.

how handy it was too that the entire cctv system was not in operation that day...

That's incorrect. Please show evidence that the entire cctv system was not in operation.