Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

The Jeremy Corbyn thread



Probably because we have a leader who the members want, but the MPs do not, whose position has become untenable, but will not step down. The party might even split apart. Looks like a mess to me.

Well there you go - I say 700,000 versus 170 odd ain't much of a split
 




How many of those who turned up support Jeremy Corbyn AND Caroline Lucas ? Great that so many want to participate in democratic decisions, not so great that they only have one vote come an election.

For sure we need PR - until then you have to stick with the largest progressive party
 




Don Quixote

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2008
8,355
the only mess is with the Labour MP's they really do not know what what the electorate want
seems to me like they might have trouble finding over a hundred prospective Labour MP's to replace the blairites although out of over 600k members they surley will find some who want what the grass roots want


A lot of the rebel MPs are not Blairites. Besides, I'd say many of the mps, especially those in swing seats do know what the electorate want, and that is precisely why they are trying to unseat him.
 






wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,624
Melbourne
Against Leadsom Jeremy Corbyn would seem the better option and would win by a landslide as long as they kick out all the Blairites first

Jeremy wouldn't win against Adolf Hitler, but please, you keep supporting him.
 




GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
Elm trees are popular in Brighton too....nationally tho
 




Southy

Active member
Jul 7, 2003
666
I'm no Corbyn supporter but surely Ed Miliband was exactly the kind of leader that the PLP are talking about replacing him with and didnt he just lose a winnable election?
 




biddles911

New member
May 12, 2014
348
Well it is since those 170 odd represent a lot of people, who are not just labour party members, or swp supporters.

Given average constituency size of 70,000 (approximately) suggests that 170 MPs represent nearly 12m people.

I know that's not the maths of the Labour leadership elections but it does put an interesting slant on the numbers!

Irrespective of the politics, it's surely self-evident, just from listening to JC in any national forum, e.g. Parliament or in the media, that he's a terrible speaker, pretty stupid and couldn't negotiate his way out of a paper bag.

Does anyone seriously consider him PM material?

If so, suggest you take a cold shower and stand in a corner with your D hat on........!

I'm no Labour supporter but would really like a credible opposition (and alternative) to the Government.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 




Soulman

New member
Oct 22, 2012
10,966
Sompting
Given average constituency size of 70,000 (approximately) suggests that 170 MPs represent nearly 12m people.

I know that's not the maths of the Labour leadership elections but it does put an interesting slant on the numbers!

Irrespective of the politics, it's surely self-evident, just from listening to JC in any national forum, e.g. Parliament or in the media, that he's a terrible speaker, pretty stupid and couldn't negotiate his way out of a paper bag.

Does anyone seriously consider him PM material?

If so, suggest you take a cold shower and stand in a corner with your D hat on........!

I'm no Labour supporter but would really like a credible opposition (and alternative) to the Government.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A good post.
 


drew

Drew
Oct 3, 2006
23,073
Burgess Hill
there's the problem, the rump of the Labour MP's understand of what a proportion of the electorate want, but the membership is being taken over by a group that understand what a smaller proportion of the electorate want. Corbyn and Chairman McDonnell simply wont appeal to vast swaths of the country with center-left views, just as UKIP wont appeal to the center right. they'll still get 200 seats from the north and a few other urban centers, its not enough to get anywhere near elected.

Have to agree with this. There seems to be too many left wingers that think having the support of a majority of the party equates to having the support of the required amount of the electorate. My union membership gives me a vote in any contest and it certainly won't go to someone I don't think has a cat in hells chance of winning a general election!
 










GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
I'm up for replacing Corbyn but there's no chance I'll support Labour with Angela Eagle at the helm.

I support Conservative voted leave and i did not want Borris as Prime Minister i don't particularly want Teresa May as the next PM either....it's all up in the air on both the blue and red sides at the moment.....especially for the voters
 


GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
So who cares what you think about the Labour Party ? It's like me giving an opinion on Crystal Palace, nobody cares

I care, can you give me an opinion (please) on Palace..Thank you in advance..
 




biddles911

New member
May 12, 2014
348
So who cares what you think about the Labour Party ? It's like me giving an opinion on Crystal Palace, nobody cares

Well, I'd have thought the Labour Party might care since I have a vote (and probably voted Labour more often than not over the decades).

You're clearly a JC supporter from your witty riposte though, so I suggest you take my advice.......?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here