*** 20-20 - Sussex v Surrey, Oval, 3rd July, 18.30 ko ****

[HAILSHAM SEAGULL]

Rain stops play

 

[Lord Bracknell]

86/5 (14 ov)

Rain stopped play

 

[jakarta]

No chance

Hush my mouth, rain arrives to save them

 

[Mackenzie]

Get out there, its only a bit drizz.

 

[Lord Bracknell]

And they're back on. No overs lost, apparently.

Last over of this innings has to start by 8.14 pm.

 

[Mackenzie]

Rippon bowls out

4-0-20-1

 

[Pevenseagull]

one of the cheeky fuckers just hit a 6

tosspot

 

[Moshe Gariani]

Another easy win for The Sharks.

Our batting line up will devour this inadequate total.

 

[Lord Bracknell]

106/6

Comedy bowling gets a wicket!

RJ Burns c Styris b Khan 23

 

[Mackenzie]

Wkt

106/6 off 16.1

 

[Pevenseagull]

cricinfo reporting a no ball followed by out caught

?

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Another break for rain.

Messrs Duckworth and Lewis are no doubt on their way.

 

[HAILSHAM SEAGULL]

Commentators called it a wide

 

[jakarta]

Another easy win for The Sharks.

Our batting line up will devour this inadequate total.

Another Rain Break - bollocks to this 'Summer'......

 

[vegster]

And they're back on. No overs lost, apparently.

Last over of this innings has to start by 8.14 pm.

If we can take 28 off the first 5 balls without losing a wicket, we might just pinch it on D/L

 

[Mackenzie]

Another Rain Break - bollocks to this 'Summer'......

The monsoon season.

 

[HAILSHAM SEAGULL]

Sussex require 109 off 15

 

[Mackenzie]

Sussex require 109 off 15

Seems reasonable.

 

[Don Tmatter]

Very tricky target with 'Rey's outstanding attack, our batflids will be lucky to get 70

 

[Gwylan]

Sussex require 109 off 15

How does that work out? Surrey scored 106 off 16.1 - how come we have to score more runs off fewer overs?