- Nov 11, 2009
- 11,387
Raul Jiménez looking an absolute snip at 5m
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] sorry but how the feck do fulham beat arsenal....
- Thread starter sydney
- Start date
The Invincibles?
Psychobilly freakout
HellBilly
Arsenal emulating their rivals, its all very Spursy
GingerBeerMan
3-0
- Dec 29, 2011
- 8,033
Going back 2 decades there
I love watching Havertz. His touch and technique is sublime, but if you don’t surround him with people willing to do the extra running, passing and nitty gritty, you’re f*cked.
there’s a reason Tuchel played him up front for Chelsea.
- Mar 23, 2023
- 1,525
Haven’t seen it but would put money on trossard being in the box and not being able to finish.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,297
Was thinking just before he scored how he’s lost it since head injury… changed my mind though
BluesRockDJ
Well-known member
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,112
Know the feeling !!
Crikey, you’ve got a good memory.
With climate change, it now starts earlier.
Tis been a good season for results like this
oops
Arteta couldn't even blame the ref today.
It was literally the first time I can recall that he didn’t blame the officials or injuries.
He’s running the same 11 into the ground, again. Arteta, Moyes, Dyche and Emery may a price for that as the season unfolds. [Subject to getting around it with a big January spend].
Not sure Arsenal have much FFP wiggle room without selling?
Arteta (and Southgate) had plenty of chances to rest Saka/Rice etc earlier in the season
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
Disappointing to see Arsenals last few games and there only win against us.
Squad costs. How the hell did they get in this company, when rarely earning CL money?
Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 14,960
As I said on a thread recently, on their day any PL team can beat any other PL team. The amount of 'shock' results means none of them are remotely shocking to me.
The reason is clear.
It's a funny old game.
It's a funny old game.
Do you have a link to where those figures come from? It does look extraordinary that the squad value is so low if that is the total market value of the squad so I’m wondering if it does not take into consideration monies agreed but not paid out yet under long transfer contracts and also factors in the lower value of players on contracts that are running down and yet to be renewed?
Their net expenditure in the summer was only second to Chelsea
Their club market value is only second to Manchester City
Premier League - Club market value
This page contains a statistic that shows a tendency of the development of the full market value of Premier League up to the respective due date.www.transfermarkt.co.uk
So clearly they have the wealth to be competing at that level.
Football finance, you can only trust @El Presidente, SwissRamble and
https://football-observatory.com/-Posts-
This is the link for that report.
https://football-observatory.com/WeeklyPost430
In answer to your question, fees recorded are the total contractually committed. Add-ons aren’t included until if and when those milestones are reached.
Last edited: