There is, I would respectfully suggest, another interpretation of @Herr Tubthumper ’s posts on this matter.Unfortunately unless @Herr Tubthumper provides us with a link to the FB account in question , to show that the account was a private account that did not name her as ‘Councilor‘ in the account name, or that led people to believe the comments made by her were related to her work as a councilor, it is covered by the CoC.
I
It applies to all occasions where the activity under question has been carried out as a Councilor or led people to believe they were carried as a Councilor.
I don’t know why you find the legislation so difficult to understand - perhaps because you keep taking paragraphs out of context or just maybe you can’t accept you are wrong on this.
But in order for you to see it, you may need to take a step back and reflect.